User talk:Ronosen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BrahMos, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. STTW (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BrahMos

Thanks for pointing that language problem out... I have changed it to something I hope will be more acceptable. Regarding the redirection itself, I'm am sure that we should leave it how it is at the present. in fact, I'd suggest that Brahmo be merged with Brahmo Samaj page, since there isn't enough content on either, and the Brahmo page certainly doesnt look encyclopedic. A third point is that most people will type in Brahmos for the missile. For the religious group, the name "Brahmo Samaj" is well known, and if they dont get there, the link on the BrahMos page will give them a link to it.

Again, coming back to name and POV point, Brahmos refers to members of the Brahmo Samaj, and can be better served by the Brahmo Samaj page. I suggest that you merge the Brahmo page with the Brahmo Samaj page. How old the organization is or whether the name is a natural or artificial name has little to do with it. Thanks. ^T/_@Sniperz11_edits^sign 00:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I have started a discussion about the redirection of Brahmos on the BrahMos Talk Page. You're free to join in. Cheers. ^T/_@Sniperz11_edits^sign 01:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Judaism

Rono you are never to do that again. I have apologised to SLRubenstein and he has accepted my apology for you on MY talk page. I have left a link for you to study on the Talk:Judaism page. Investigate it thoroughly to see the fallacies. Yvantanguy (talk) 12:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)