Talk:Rongbuk Monastery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiproject_Buddhism

This article is part of WikiProject Tibet:Tibetan Buddhism, an attempt to improve content and create better coordination between articles related to traditional religion, cultural practices and customs in Tibet. Please participate in improvement by editing Rongbuk Monastery and related pages, or visit the WikiProject Tibet main page for more details on the projects.

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
WikiProject Buddhism This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Rongbuk Monastery, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Name

Where does the k in Rongbuk come from? It's not in the Tibetan name given in this article. And why is it not Rongpu with a p? —Babelfisch 12:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't know, I thought of that, too. Rongbuk does seem to be the more common English name. Perhaps it is some local dialect of Tibetan? Or perhaps it is influenced one of the numerous unrelated languages spoken in the Himalayas? In any event, Rongbuk appears to be the most common name in English.—Nat Krause(Talk!) 14:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

It is in the Tibetan name: "Rdza-rong-phu". --Voidvector 05:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't see the k. —Babelfisch 07:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rewrite?

Nobody asked me, but this article is written poorly. This reads more like a narrative of a novel than an encyclopedia article. Phrases such as "It [has] the most dramatic views in the world" simply do not belong in this article. Riobranden 18:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I did what I could to fix it, but it has issues that only a complete rewrite could solve. ~ Eidako 23:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Thank you -- Riobranden 19:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stubbiness

Does this article still warrant being called a stub? What more can be added? Maybe a link to more detailed info/photos? --JD79 20:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)