Talk:Rome SDS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh man, I totally messed that move up, I read the article on moving wrong and somehow didn't notice the Move button, ever til now. Hopefully some admin will come by and move Rome_snowboards over here properly. Sorry all! jobeus 17:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This whole article reads like an advertisement. I understand that they are a "different" kind of snowboard company, but the whole article sounds very, very PRish. I don't know enough about wikipedia or the company to change it the way it should be, but I would appreciate it if it was revised or prefaced with something that says it has been disputed. -- Rob
hey I just added the stuff about the bindings but it dosint sound right if somone gets a chance revise it thanks -andrew
I agree with Rob, the language of the entire article was very un-encyclopedic. I've tidied up the language and very slightly changed the structure, but the page in general needs a lot of work, if anyone has any more relevant information about the company. Nicpowel (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rome logo.gif
Image:Rome logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
