Talk:Roman and Byzantine Greece

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Greece      (Rated Start-Class) Greece Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece. If you would like to participate, you can improve Roman and Byzantine Greece, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (comments) Top This article has been rated as a Top priority article Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. To participate, improve this article or visit the project page for more information. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. Top This article is on a subject of Top-importance within classical antiquity. WikiProject Middle Ages (Rated Start-Class) Middle Ages Portal Roman and Byzantine Greece is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Middle Ages To do: Military history WikiProject     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

[edit] Comments

"as Horace said, Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit" That's nice. What does it mean in English? (I couldn't find any babelfish translation webpages for latin) WhiteC 15:06, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Something like "Conquered Greece conquered the wild victor," that is, Rome became civilized after conquering Greece. I wonder if there is a standard English translation of Horace that we should use. Adam Bishop 16:39, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Duplication

This article overlaps the content of Roman Greece. I suggest either (1) merging that article into this one; or (2) deleting the overlapping section from this one and renaming it "Greece in the Byzantine period" or something to that effect. Comments? --Russ Blau (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree that the duplication is unnecessary. How about we keep Roman Greece, and split the content of this article between Roman Greece and Byzantine Empire? Tom Harrison ^Talk 15:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Tom Harrison's proposal (ie keep Roman Greece and split this article between Roman Greece and Byzantine Empire). I don't think it's a good idea to merge everything in an article called "Roman and Byzantine Greece", if for no good reason, because in most medieval Latin sources the term "Greece" refers to the entire Byzantine state. Miskin 16:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

This article, however, deals specifically with developments in the geographic area now known as "Greece", while the Byzantine Empire article covers a much wider area. --Russ Blau (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually, the Byzantine Empire and "Greece" in the middle ages are synonymus terms so the original division of this article is entirely justified. In a strictly geographic sense, the theme or province of Greece within Byzantium only encompassed a fraction of the area today, leaving out most of modern Greece (areas like Greece Macedonia, Epirus and the Aegean) a fact that further renders this article improper. Greece arose from a province within the Roman Empire into the Empire itself, so articles dealing with different time periods need to adjust to the changing political and historical landscapes. Colossus 23:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

The original intention of this article was as part of a series on the history of the territory of modern Greece. Perhaps that was a misguided division, but "Byzantine Empire" and "Greece" are not really synonymous, and Roman Greece alone wouldn't cover medieval Greece. As RussBlau said, the Byzantine Empire covers a much wider area. Adam Bishop 04:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Even as part of a series of the territory of modern Greece the article was still out of place, since as I noted above, modern Greece encompasses a much greater area that the medieval province or theme of Graecia did. If the territory populated by ethnic Greeks is any means of defining "Greece" at any time, or in our case the Middle Ages, Asia Minor should be part of all such historical articles, being the most densely populated Greek territory, multiple times that of Greece proper. There is no reason as to why a historical article should be limited to a particular geographic area. If the borders of Greece changed through the ages, shouldnt any historical article reflect those changes as well? Colossus 19:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

It's irrelevant speaking with Bishop about these things, he's so utterly consumed with his desire to re-latinize The Greek Empire of the Middle Ages that he refuses to see things differently.

[edit] Catalan propaganda

Please, do not write about catalan bullshit propaganda. There is simply no historical proof nor trusted reference from neither Greek, European or American authorities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.219.85.250 (talk) 00:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)