Talk:Roman Heart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Discussion
Birth name given which is public information. Look at any of the other profiles of adult stars and thier birth names are given as well. No "special treatment" should be given to this star.
- Information returned to article. Subject's name is in the public record, and subject is a public figure.207.69.137.206 01:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, all Wikipedia articles must conform to the verifiability and No original research policies. Unless his name has been printed in a source that can be easily verified, discovering Mr. Heart's real name would require primary research, which is what Wikipedia is trying to avoid. Not to mention it is incredibly rude to do so; there is a reason adult actors have stage names. If he doesn't want his name revealed please do not do so. --Todd 19:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Here's a quote from the article Biographies of living persons : 'Biographies of living persons (BLPs) must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm".' As far as I can see, revealing his birth name could potentially harm him. People who are eager to expose him (no pun intended) should not be the reason that he is constantly worrying about his privacy, or even safety. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.20.118 (talk) 15:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Redeleted birth name David in DC (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Redeleted birth name David in DC (talk) 12:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sixteen months is a very long time
Per IceStorm's request, I won't delete again, but if this article is of any importance, someone ought to bring it up to minimal WP standards. It's hard to see how the project is helped by having this low quality of article explicitly identified as such for more than a year. It should be fixed (by someone who thinks it's worth keeping) or it should be gone (my preference). I'll go nominate for deletion, as Ice suggests. David in DC (talk) 04:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blanking of page
Please note that user David in DC is stalking every page I have ever posted, apparently intent on mischief. He has already blanked this page once. Anyone interested in this page should keep an eye on it and contact me on my talk page if further problems arise from this user. If he repeatedly blanks this page, you may want to request a block and let me know on my talk page. John celona (talk) 13:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)