Talk:Roman Catholicism in Nepal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roman Catholicism in Nepal article.
Article policies
Good article Roman Catholicism in Nepal has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
July 22, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
Catholicism Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, which collaborates on articles related to the Roman Catholic Church. To participate, edit this article or visit the project page for details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Christianity
Christianity Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments
To-do list for Roman Catholicism in Nepal: edit · history · watch · refresh
  • further development with current events (regarding the new constitution in Nepal).
  • get/request free use images
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Nepal may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Copyrighted Image

The image included is copyrighted material. There is no fair use comment in the article, and as far as I can tell, no attempt was made to obtain permission from the copyright owner to use the image. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

  • But there is a fair use rationale and a tag, and a source. Judgesurreal777 16:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I just added two fair use tags in the article itself, thought you meant on the image itself. Judgesurreal777 16:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Three points:

  • Assuming you uploaded the image, did you try to obtain permission from the copyright holder?
  • I'm not convinced of the fair use rationale you provided. I added a fair use review tag to the image, so someone more knowledgable can check it out. This is not the same as a fair use dispute, and will not necessarily lead to its deletion, unless the reviewer takes that route.
  • I do not think this article should receive Good Article status until this is cleared up.

MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I'll take it down and request that they release it into the public domain, and I'll put out a request for a free use image :) I think the GA review can be completed now.Judgesurreal777 18:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This is a Good Article

After review, I have found this article to meet the qualifications for Good Article status. It is well written and comprehensive, as well as being well referenced. Further enhancements could include more free/fair use images (proper licences is critical to GA or FA status), and further development with current events (regarding the new constitution in Nepal). If you have any questions about my rationale, leave me a message on my talk page. Phidauex 19:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)