Roland Fréart de Chambray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roland Fréart, sieur de Chambray (1606 — 1676) was a French theorist of architecture and the arts; though not a practitioner himself, his two major publications appeared at a moment when French architects were struggling to apply a new sense of discipline and order to the practice of building.

Contents

[edit] Biography

Fréart de Chambray and his brother, Jean Fréart, sieur de Chantelou, were sent to Rome in 1640, commissioned by their cousin François Sublet de Noyers, the superintendent of the Bâtiments du Roi, to secure the services of the best French artist in Rome, Nicolas Poussin, and to arrange for casts and copies to be made of the best antiquities in Roman collections, for the French royal palaces. Casts of bas-reliefs sent back to Paris found use in the decor of the ceiling compartments in the Grand Galerie of the Palais du Louvre. There were also seventy casts from reliefs of sections of Trajan's Column. Chantelou returned to Italy in 1643, with projects to cast the colossal horsemen of the Quirinal in bronze for the main entrance to the Louvre, but the death of Richelieu, the disgrace of Sublet de Noyer and the death of the King (1642-43) brought these ambitious projects to naught (Haskell and Penny 1981: 32).

Fréart de Chambray completed a translation of the full text of Andrea Palladio's Quattro Libri (Venice 1570) into French[1] for the first time. An earlier publication of the first book only, by Pierre Le Muet (1645), had made a very free translation, adjusted to conform to French practice; it proved popular and was freely pirated in the following decades. Fréart's translation, completed about 1641, which had also been commissioned by his cousin Sublet de Noyers hung fire as Sublet de Noyers was first disgraced (1643), then died in 1645. Following a stay in Rome, Fréart published it in Paris, 1650. Its "Dédicace à ses frères" is an open letter to his brother connoisseurs and patrons, hoping "to banish this capricious and monstrous fashion of building that some moderns have unhappily introduced as a heresy in the art, by I know not what licentiousness against its precepts and Reason itself".[2] Fréart substitutes his elegant and literate dedication for Palladio's original dedication, and reprints the woodcuts from the Venice edition, which he had brought to Paris for the express purpose.

The same year, 1650, he published an anthology of ten ancient and modern writers on the classical orders, his Parallèle de l’architecture antique avec la moderne, which marked the first complete translation of Vitruvius into French and upheld the superiority of the Ancients over the Moderns, a polemic that was to erupt in the following decades into a virtual culture war. In his preface, Fréart de Chambray argues that the Classical orders (the Doric, the Ionic, and Corinthian) which he assigns to Greek precedents, are perfect models for all architecture; he condemns the "Roman orders" (the Tuscan and the Composite) as corrupt. Citing the use of the Corinthian order in the Temple of Solomon, he declares it to be the ‘flower of Architecture and the Order of Orders'. To Fréart de Chambray, who illustrated his text with copious engravings, Vitruvius and his translators were beyond reproach.

His Parallèle was translated into English— the translator was the distinguished connoisseur John Evelyn— as A parallel of the antient architecture with the modern: in a collection of ten principal authors who have written upon the five orders ... (London:"Printed by Tho. Roycroft for John Place") 1664.

In 1651, he put his excellent command of Italian and his connoisseurship to good use in a translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della pittura. His Idée de la perfection de la peinture appeared in 1662, providing a text that was fundamental to French academic painting into the following century..

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Les quatre livres de l’architecture d’André Palladio: mis en françois: dans lesquels, aprés un petit traitté des cinq ordres, avec quelques-unes des plus nécessaires observations pour bien bastir, il parle de la construction des maisons particulieres, des grands chemins, des ponts, des places publiques, des xystes, des basiliques, & des temples. (Paris: Edme Martin) 1650.
  2. ^ "de bannir cette capricieuse et monstrueuse façon de bâtir, que quelques modernes ont malheureusement introduite comme une hérésie dans l’art, par je ne sais quel libertinage contre ses préceptes et la raison même."

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  • (Fréart de Chambray, Roland), 2005. Parallèle de l'architecture antique avec la moderne suivi de Idée de la perfection de la peinture introduced and edited by Frédérique Lemerle-Pauwels and Milovan Stanic (Paris : Ensba)
  • Francis Haskell and Nicholas Penny, 1981. Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Antique Sculpture 1500-1900 (Yale University Press)

[edit] See also