User talk:Rogerborg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rogerborg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maciejowski Image - not in public domain

Image:MaciejowskiBibleManoahAndWife.jpg

Hi Chris. I don't believe that this image is in the public domain. It's either taken from the original manuscript, in which case it is "Copyright © 2000-2004 Medieval Tymes, All Rights Reserved.", or it's a scan from a printing that's copyright Pierpont Morgan Library, of no earlier than 1927, and so not out of copyright. Either way, it's not public domain, although it may be arguable as fair use. Rogerborg 13:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I am not a copyright expert. As I understand, the original bible is from ~1250, hence out of copyright. A facsimile was published in 1927. The (legal) question is, if the facsimile is identical with the original images (hence no copyright), or if artistic value has been added. A reprint of an out-of-copyright document also has no copyright. As for now, I see the image still as public domain. For requests to remove the image refer to Wikipedia:Copyright problems -- Chris 73 | Talk 14:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
I have listed the problem at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 March 21, please feel free to add your comments there. If the image is indeed not a copy of an image from the 13th century, then it has to be removed. -- Chris 73 | Talk 14:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] crossbow

We had quite a hard time with this section about the Second Lateran Council because we could find no evidence for a specific ban in any available version of the original texts. Could you do somemore research whether your shortened version is correct? I always found crossbows listed together with other ranged weapons and in my opinion we should mention this. Wandalstouring 15:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] City of heroes

Your removal of the paragraph, was bold (ie a good thing) and an incentive to put further sources into the article. I restored it in part with cites and some rewording. Could you cast you eye over it and comment, and/or adjust. Thanks Catwhoorg 11:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)