Talk:Roger W. Moss, Jr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roger W. Moss, Jr. is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Back off, Toasty. I'm getting a little cranky. --Mothperson 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What is this "(preservationists)" crap, and "alleged"'s??? Suddenly it's a crime to be a well-known? Or to be called well-known when one is but the person using the word "alleged" doesn't like you? Or to be called a well-known preservationist when one actually is, but a person exists in the world who doesn't agree with one's beliefs? Jeezum crow, Toasty. Why don't you go make trouble in the all-so-important world of Wikipedia articles on New York television news - boy, there's a significant topic, or license plate collections, or the Jackie Gleason Bus Stop and give this one up, because YOU. WILL. NOT. WIN. HERE. I PROMISE. Go rewrite that ghastly stub about Frank Field (meteorologist) ("I think he's a medical doctor"). You've got soooo many stubs that need work. Get busy. Lazy lazy socks. Haven't read one substantive thing by you yet. --Mothperson 20:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bloody Americans!

I go look up Roger Moss and I find a bloody American! This whole thing is getting to damn Ameri-centric. I look at the history and I see that there was a page that gave an option for the American and the Welsh sculptor and it was removed. Typical American nonsense they thing they can control everything. Some bloody international encylopedia! Ameri-CentricPatrol 30 June 2005 13:29 (UTC)

Those who don't read article history are condemned to - uh, I guess have apoplexy. --Mothperson 30 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)

[edit] POV - This gentelman seems to be rather disputed

This gentelman seems to be cause of great dispute, and the article seems to be slanted more in favour of Mr. Moss. Frühstücksdienst 19:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)