Talk:Roger Chang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Contradicts the statement on Catherine Schwarz I've done a quick Google, and have found no reference to either being married to the other. Also http:www.catschwartz.com/archives/000006.html suggest not. Can anyone verify this? Daran 03:54, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I've taken it out for now; judging from the edit history, I'm unable to tell exactly how much of this article is bogus, possibly all of it. - Hephaestos 03:56, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)
What is there to be bogus about? It's only one sentence.  :) RickK 04:13, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Is he really on TechTV though? (I haven't checked the web, and don't subscribe to cable. I'd hate to think we missed batting 1.000 here though. </sarcasm> ;) - Hephaestos 04:17, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I've recreated the Cat Schwarz page - She's real, and has recently gained some notoriety through having accidently released topless photographs of herself onto the net. I'm not sure this gem deserves to be included in an encyclopedia article on her, but if it's good enough for Bush's daughter... --Daran 04:46, 14 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Shouldn't the segment about Roger operating the cameras for DL.TV be replaced with the fact that he is now a co-host on the show? Am I allowed to put that in? (slightly new to editing Wikipedia and want to do it right) Lcarsos 03:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

if you've got a reliable source (see WP:RS and WP:V for definitions of those) you can add the information and cite the source.--Crossmr 04:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable sources

This thing is full of "references" to vidcasts, podcasts, etc. These are not generally considered reliable sources, for the same reason that blogs are not. Could we get some more solid sourcing? This article has been cited as an specific example of "this other crap exists, so why was my article deleted?" --Orange Mike | Talk 16:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)