User talk:RodentofDeath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RodentofDeath

The above Arbitration case has closed and the full decision can be viewed at the link above. You are now banned from Wikipedia for one year, and Susanbryce is reminded of the prohibition on using Wikipedia as a platform for advocacy.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Anthøny 00:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "not actually requesting unblock. need to appeal a block reset."

Decline reason: "Please contact a member of WP:ARBCOM. It may be that you are entirely unrelated to that IP address but regular admins have no way to determine this. A member of ARBCOM will be able to make this determination. — Yamla (talk) 16:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

apparently somebody reset the date of my block for block evasion. i have not edited wikipedia since i was banned. i'm not sure exactly what happened here i just know i didnt edit anything. i am allowed to look at articles, correct? thats all i have done. by the way, susanbryce, who was reminded by the arbitration committee in the case that produced my ban, is now removing well cited info that doesnt conform to her POV inserting blatantly false info into the human trafficking in angeles article. i'm not sure why this is allowed to continue. if you need examples i would be happy to provide them but i am sure just checking the references will give you all the info you need. for instance, she says 2005 crime statistics are incomplete by using an article from 2004. she also anonymously edits to insert that the tourist police keep out the PNP (false, they are part of the PNP and share an office and patrols with them on fields) and are paid by the bars (they arent paid at all. they are volunteers). i'll let the deviant sex acts comment speak for itself. RodentofDeath (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)