Talk:Rodgers Instruments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Business and economics Portal This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub	rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

Pipe organ Portal Rodgers Instruments is part of WikiProject PipeOrgan, which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's content relating to the pipe organ and its associated repertoire, organists, and other articles. If you would like to participate, you can edit Rodgers Instruments, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Looking to help? Check out the to-do list: Get Pipe organ nearer to WP:FA status by adding references, and discuss moving some content to subpages (see also talk). Contribute to the clean up of organ pipe, flue pipe etc., see Mini-projects Find places to link to organ console Copy edit organ stop Create article about the various types of windchest Add the new {{organist-stub}} to biographical articles either instead of, or additional to the {{Keyboardist-stub}} that currently exists. Add Category:Electronic organ manufacturing companies to List of organ builders.

	Oregon Portal This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week.
Stub	This page is rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article is rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rodgersinstruments.gif

Image:Rodgersinstruments.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clean up

Unless you actually clean up the article, please do not remove the clean up tag. Though you made some improvements, you will notice almost all of the article is unsourced, the section headers fail the WP:MOS (notice this was linked in the edit summary), and there is a trivia section. Currently the article could be deleted for failing WP:CORP since there are zero WP:RS that are independent of the subject used to assert notability. Please rectify soon since you removed the tag, otherwise per WP:V (a core policy) most of the article will need to be deleted. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the removal of the primary sources template, were the sources listed actually used to create the article? These were not listed before, and the content of the article did not change before they were added. Unless they were actually used (best to show using inline citations/footnotes, see WP:CITE) they should not be listed. Aboutmovies (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)