User talk:RockMaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to my talk page. If you feel the need to talk to me for anything, here's the place to do it.

[edit] Portmanteau

Hi, thanks for your message about the word "blend." I have had a conversation about this same word with another user, User:Centrx. However, when I have tried to replace the word portmanteau with "blend," others have reverted my changes. I would like to better understand how to use the word blend—can you give me an example of morphemes that have more than one meaning (which are still called portmanteaux)? -- Renesis (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, a morpheme that has more than one meaning is really any word with the suffix -s. It can imply differences in number, person, tense, or mood, depending. Though, this may not be what you are looking for, as it is more of a letter than a word. No word-word combinations of multiple meanings come to mind at the moment, but I'll give it some thought and let you know if I can think of any on your talk page later. It seems though, that if the official definition is blend, not portmanteau, then all you need to do is say something like, "Official use is blend, not portmanteau. See Portmanteau." Portmanteau is not a word that should be used in Wikipedia, save it's official usage. I think that people will understand that, if you give them good reason. --RockMaster 23:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice! I will do as you suggest. -- Renesis (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Glad to be of help --RockMaster 23:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wii

Those may be "well known" to hackers, but I can assure you they are not well known to most people. Articles have to be written with the average person in mind. TJ Spyke 01:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Both claims seem like they need to be sourced. I am not sure about either one, and admins always say it's better to be oversourced than undersourced. TJ Spyke 03:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure. But if it's common knowledge, then some sites or magazines must have mentioned it before. TJ Spyke 22:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Massappeal.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Massappeal.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bring the Noise.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bring the Noise.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Welcome to the Jungle.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Welcome to the Jungle.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)