Talk:Rochester Rattlers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Lacrosse WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the sport of lacrosse. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] 2006 East standings for NJ/LI/Roch

When the seaon ended I sent an email to mll asking about 3-5 in the east I finally got a response today: They (NJ, LI, ROC) would be decided first by overall record but they were all 5-7. Then by head-to-head record among all tied teams, but each team was 1-1 against each other. Then by overall conference record - NJ was 5-5 against the East, and ROC/LI were 4-6, so NJ becomes the "best" of those Teams and the #3 team in the East. The tie-breakers then re-apply to just ROC & LI, so they are both 5-7, both 1-1 against each other, both 4-6 in the east, so the next tiebreaker is total points scored margin in their games against each other. LI won 19-7 and ROC won 15-13, so LI is the "better" of those teams because they were +10 and so LI becomes the #4 team, ROC is #5 and BAL was #6 because they had the worst record in the conf.

So I made a correction on the standings

Smith03 22:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not to be forgotten

Do we really need this section? --Paploo 19:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)