Talk:Rochdale A.F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
The article on Rochdale A.F.C. is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the England task force. |
[edit] Bottom division?
The article about the Football League says Football League Two is the third highest division, not the lowest. Can someone clarify this? --Awiseman 17:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- It is the lowest of the three divisions of the Football League. They are the second, third and fourth highest levels of English football, with the FA Premier League being first. --rbrwr± 21:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
The third division aka Coca Cola League Two is the bottom tier of League football. It must have been an error on the Football League article.
[edit] Wags
I removed the word "wags" from "some wags have even renamed it the Rochdale division", since I don't think it's NPOV. I'm not that well versed in English slang so if I am in error here concering NPOV please correct me. Thanks. -RomeW 08:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rochdale badge.gif
Image:Rochdale badge.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
