Rock-paper-scissors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 It has been suggested that Janken be merged into this article or section. (Discuss)
For the Catatonia album, see Paper Scissors Stone (album).
Rock-paper-scissors chart
Rock-paper-scissors chart

Rock-paper-scissors (also known as jan-ken-pon, rochambeau (sometimes spelled roshambo), ching-chang-wulla, and many derived terms[1]), is a popular two-person hand game.

The game is often used as a selection method in a similar way to coin flipping or drawing straws to randomly select a person for some purpose. However, unlike truly random selections, it can be played with skill if the game extends over many sessions, as a player can often recognize and exploit the non-random behavior of an opponent.

Sportspeople often use the game (both officially and unofficially, in place of a coin toss) to decide on opening plays. Similarly, uncertain calls, or even the whole game in case of rain, may be so decided.[citation needed] It is also often used as a method for creating appropriately non-biased random results in live action role-playing games, as it requires no equipment. It is also used in some online gambling sites as a form of novelty betting.

Contents

[edit] Terminology

The exact name of the game can vary, with the three components appearing in a different order, or with "stone" in place of "rock". Non-English-speakers often refer to the game by their words for "rock-paper-scissors" (though not necessarily in that order).

[edit] Cheating

A common timing-based tactic on a throw of paper or scissors is to wait until the last possible moment to dupe an opponent into believing that one may actually be throwing a scissors or rock. This is usually regarded as a foul at competitive RPS matches. In competitive RPS, however, a foul can be called on any throw that is revealed after thrower's arm swings past the perpendicular to his torso. In this case, the referee may then assign a throw of rock, or a "forced rock".

Priming is the number of bounces one does before revealing the throw. Another way to cheat is to prime three times to an opponent's twice, so that one sees his opponent's throw without revealing his own. In such cases the round will usually be replayed.

To prevent timing-based cheating, the players may be asked to hold their throwing hands behind their backs and reveal their already-formed throws after the count of three.

Another form of cheating is simpler and harder to detect. The strategy of claiming that your hand is scissors when the opponent claims it is paper. One would hold out their hand making the paper form when one sees your opponent has scissors one would open two fingers but not closing the others claiming that is simply 'how you make your scissors'. Of course it is simple to solve this, a do-over would make it right.

However, before playing, the two playing must decide the count on which they will throw their hands.

[edit] Mathematics

[edit] Non-transitivity

RPS is also often used as an example of the mathematical concept of non-transitivity. A transitive relation R is one for which a R b and b R c implies a R c. A reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive relation on a set is known as a partial ordering, from which notions of "greater" and "less" follow. A game option which is "greater" than another is closer to being optimal, but such a notion does not exist in RPS: The relation used to determine which throws defeat which is non-transitive. Rock defeats scissors, and scissors defeat paper, but rock loses to paper. In fact, RPS could be called "intransitive" because A is greater than B, and B is greater than C, yet A is not greater than C.

[edit] Example of a commutative non-associative magma

In mathematics, it can be shown that there exist magmas (groupoids) that are commutative but not associative. One example is given by the operation of RPS.

[edit] Arrow's impossibility theorem

Arrow's impossibility theorem states that if there are at least three options for which to vote, then there is no system of elections which will always satisfy certain "fairness" criteria. A proof of the theorem uses a situation analogous to RPS, where a candidate A would beat candidate B in a two-person contest, B would beat C, and C would beat A. The proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem, stating that no voting system with certain fairness properties is immune to "tactical voting" or a "spoiler effect", uses a similar idea.

[edit] Variations

Players have developed numerous cultural and personal variations on the game, from simply playing the same game with different objects, to expanding into five-weapon variants (e.g. "rock-paper-scissors-Spock-lizard")[2] and those of purely theoretical interest having 25 or more weapons.[3][4] With an odd number of choices, each beats half the weapons and loses to half the weapons. No even number of weapons can be made balanced, unless some pairs of weapons result in a draw; there will always be some weapons superior to others. These also lose some of the aesthetic elegance of the game, which is otherwise one of the simplest possible games of skill.

An example of an unbalanced four-weapon game adds "dynamite" as a trump. Dynamite, expressed as the extended index finger or thumb, defeats only rock, but is defeated by either scissors or paper. Given that paper performs better than dynamite (it beats anything dynamite will beat, and ties or beats anything dynamite will tie), it is always better to use paper than to use dynamite. In game theory terms, the strategy of "paper" weakly dominates "dynamite".[5] A similar variation exists in Greece, adding "pencil", a weapon which beats ("writes on") paper, but is destroyed by rock or scissors.[citation needed]

One popular variant adds "fire" and "water" as potential trumps. Fire will beat any of the standard weapons (rock, paper, scissors), but a player may only throw it once in his entire lifetime. Water may be played as many times as one wishes, but loses to any throw except fire. (Those who adopt this trump depend on its notability and good sportsmanship to enforce the once-per-lifetime rule.)[6]

A variation found in Indonesia is composed of an earwig, a human, and an elephant. The earwig is able to climb into the elephant's ear and drive it insane, while the human crushes the earwig and the elephant crushes the human.[7]

[edit] Analogies in nature and computing

[edit] Video games

Combat or strategy-based video games often feature RPS-like cycles in their characters' or units' effectiveness against others. These often attempt to emulate cycles in real-world combat (such as where cavalry are effective against archers, archers have an edge over spearmen, and spearmen are strongest against cavalry), or simple elemental trinities such as fire, water and air. Such game mechanics can make a game somewhat self-balancing, by preventing any one simple strategy from dominating gameplay.

Many card-based video games in Japan use the RPS system as their core fighting system, with the winner of each round being able to carry out their designated attack. (A popular game involving an extended RPS strategy is Pokemon, in which attacks have varied effectiveness based on 17 elemental types.)

[edit] Mating strategies

The Common Side-blotched Lizard (Uta stansburiana) exhibits a RPS pattern in its different mating strategies.
The Common Side-blotched Lizard (Uta stansburiana) exhibits a RPS pattern in its different mating strategies.

Biologist Barry Sinervo from the University of California, Santa Cruz has discovered an RPS evolutionary strategy in the mating behaviour of the side-blotched lizard species Uta stansburiana. Males have either orange, blue or yellow throats and each type follows a fixed, heritable mating strategy:[8]

  • Orange-throated males are strongest and do not form strong pair bonds; instead, they fight blue-throated males for their females. Yellow-throated males, however, manage to snatch females away from them for mating.
  • Blue-throated males are middle-sized and form strong pair bonds. While they are outcompeted by orange-throated males, they can defend against yellow-throated ones.
  • Yellow-throated males are smallest, and their coloration mimics females. Under this disguise, they can approach orange-throated males but not the stronger-bonding blue-throated specimens and mate while the orange-throats are engaged in fights.

This can be summarized as "orange beats blue, blue beats yellow, and yellow beats orange", which is similar to the rules of rock-paper-scissors.

The proportion of each male type in a population is similar in the long run, but fluctuates widely in the short term. For periods of 4-5 years, one strategy predominates, after which it declines in frequency as the strategy that manages to exploit its weakness increases. This corresponds to the stable pattern of the game in the replicator dynamics where the dynamical system follows closed orbits around the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium[citation needed] (Sinervo & Lively, 1996; Sinervo, 2001; Alonzo & Sinervo, 2001; Sinervo & Clobert, 2003; Sinervo & Zamudio, 2001).

Bacteria also exhibit a rock-paper-scissors dynamic when they engage in antibiotic production. The theory for this finding was demonstrated by computer simulation and in the laboratory by Benjamin Kerr, working at Stanford University with Brendan Bohannan (Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):171-4.). The antibiotics in question are the bacteriocins - more specifically, colicins produced by Escherichia coli. Biologist Benjamin C. Kirkup, Jr. further demonstrated that the colicins were active as E. coli compete with each other in the intestines of mice, and that the rock-paper-scissors dynamics allowed for the continued competition between antibiotic producing and antibiotic sensitive strains, because antibiotic resistant strains would out-compete the producing strains, providing an environment in which sensitive strains could successfully become established again (Nature. 2004 Mar 25;428(6981):412-4.).

[edit] Cultural references

Because of its widespread use, the game has received substantial references in popular culture. Many television series poke fun at particular characters' incompetence at understanding the rules, or show how mischievous characters are often able to "win" the game by inventing new objects which beat all the others.

[edit] Federal case

In 2006, Federal Judge Gregory Presnell from the Middle District of Florida ordered opposing sides in a lengthy court case to settle a trivial (but lengthily debated) point over the appropriate place for a deposition using the game of rock-paper-scissors.[9] The ruling in Avista Management v. Wausau Underwriters stated:

Upon consideration of the Motion – the latest in a series of Gordian knots that the parties have been unable to untangle without enlisting the assistance of the federal courts – it is ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED. Instead, the Court will fashion a new form of alternative dispute resolution, to wit: at 4:00 P.M. on Friday, June 30, 2006, counsel shall convene at a neutral site agreeable to both parties. If counsel cannot agree on a neutral site, they shall meet on the front steps of the Sam M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse, 801 North Florida Ave., Tampa, Florida 33602. Each lawyer shall be entitled to be accompanied by one paralegal who shall act as an attendant and witness. At that time and location, counsel shall engage in one (1) game of "rock, paper, scissors." The winner of this engagement shall be entitled to select the location for the 30(b)(6) deposition to be held somewhere in Hillsborough County during the period July 11-12, 2006.

– [10]

The public release of this judicial order, requiring counsel to resort to a childish game to resolve a dispute, was widely circulated among area lawyers. It served the function of shaming the respective law firms regarding their litigation conduct.[citation needed]

[edit] Auction house RPS match

Large Trees Under the Jas de Bouffan sold for $11,776,000 at Christie's.
Large Trees Under the Jas de Bouffan sold for $11,776,000 at Christie's[11].

When Takashi Hashiyama, CEO of a Japanese television equipment manufacturer, decided to auction off the collection of Impressionist paintings owned by his corporation, including works by Cézanne, Picasso and van Gogh, he contacted two leading U.S. auction houses, Christie's International and Sotheby's Holdings, seeking their proposals on how they would bring the collection to the market as well as how they would maximize the profits from the sale. Both firms made elaborate proposals, but neither was persuasive enough to get Hashiyama’s business. Willing to split up the collection into separate auctions, Hashiyama asked the firms to decide between themselves who would get the Cézanne's "Large Trees Under the Jas de Bouffan", worth $12-16 million.

The houses were unable to reach a decision. Hashiyama told the two firms to play RPS, to decide who would get the rights to the auction, explaining that "it probably looks strange to others, but I believe this is the best way to decide between two things which are equally good".

The auction houses had a weekend to come up with a choice of move. Christie's went to the 11-year-old twin daughters of an employee, who suggested "scissors" because "Everybody expects you to choose 'rock'." Sotheby's said that they treated it as a game of chance and had no particular strategy for the game, but went with "paper".[12]

Christie's won the match, with millions of dollars of commission for the auction house.

[edit] Tournaments

[edit] WRPS sanctioned tournaments

Starting in 2002, the World Rock Paper Scissors Society (WRPS) standardized a set of rules for international play[13] and has overseen annual International World Championships. These open, competitive championships have been widely attended by players from around the world and have attracted widespread international media attention.[14][15][16][17][18] WRPS events are noted for their large cash prizes, elaborate staging, and colourful competitors.[19] In 2004, the championships were broadcast on the U.S. television network Fox Sports Net.

[edit] World Championship results since 2002

Year Host City Medal Champion Gender Nationality
2002[20] Toronto Gold Peter Lovering Male Flag of Canada Canada
Silver Moe Asem Male Flag of Canada Canada
Bronze Dave Ferris Male Flag of Canada Canada
2003[21] Gold Rob Krueger Male Flag of Canada Canada
Silver Marc Rigaux Male Flag of Canada Canada
Bronze Patrick Merry Male Flag of Canada Canada
2004[22] Gold Lee Rammage Male Flag of Canada Canada
Silver Heather Birrell Female Flag of Canada Canada
Bronze Chris Berggeren Male Flag of the United States United States
2005[23] Gold Andrew Bergel Male Flag of Canada Canada
Silver Stan Long Male Flag of the United States United States
Bronze Stuart Waldman Male Flag of the United States United States
2006[24] Gold Bob Cooper Male Flag of the United Kingdom Great Britain
Silver Bryan Bennett Male Flag of the United States United States
Bronze Tom Smith Male Flag of the United States United States
2007[25] Gold Andrea Farina Female Flag of the United States United States
Silver David "Maximus" Arnold Male Flag of the United States United States
Bronze James Doolittle Male Flag of Canada Canada

[edit] Tour events

In addition to the International World Championships the WRPS also endorses or sanctions a year-round series of tournaments world wide. "Endorsed" tournaments agree to abide by the WRPS standardized international rules of play and code of conduct, while "Sanctioned" tournaments will net the winner a trip to compete at the International World Championships. Some of the major events of this tour include:

[edit] World Series of Roshambo

 This section does not cite any references or sources. (October 2007)
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed.

Professional poker player Phil Gordon hosts the annual World Series of Roshambo during the World Series of Poker every year. In 2006, Annie Duke outlasted a field of 64 players who paid $500 each to enter the tournament. First place prize was $10,000. This is the largest buy-in Roshambo event in the world.

[edit] USARPS Tournaments

USA Rock Paper Scissors League (USARPS) is the principal rock-paper-scissors league of the United States. It is sponsored by Bud Light. Matti Leshem is the co-commissioner of the USARPS.

In April 2006, the inaugural USARPS Championship was held in Las Vegas, Nevada. Following months of regional qualifying tournaments held across the US, 257 players were flown to Las Vegas for a single-elimination tournament at the House of Blues where the winner received $50,000. The tournament was shown on the A&E Network on June 12, 2006.

At the first USARPS Championship, Dave "The Drill" McGill defeated Robert "Fast Twitch" Twitchel to win the tournament. In addition, Jason "King of the Morning" Wood won a best-of-500 marathon to earn a brand new car.

The $50,000 2007 USARPS Tournament took place at the Las Vegas Mandalay Bay in May 2007 and was covered by RawVegas.tv and will also be airing on ESPN later this year. The winner was Jamie Langridge from Odessa, Texas and he went home with the Bud Light Trophy and $50,000.

[edit] National XtremeRPS Competition 2007-2008

The XtremeRPS National Competition[26] is a US nationwide RPS competition with Preliminary Qualifying contests starting in January 2007 and ending in May 2008, followed by regional finals in June and July 2008. The national finals will be held in Des Moines in August 2008, with a chance to win up to $5,000.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Ready, set ... Roshambo! Contestants vie for $1,000 purse in Rock, Scissors, Paper contest. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved on 2007-11-20.
  2. ^ Kass, Sam (2006-07-03). Rock Paper Scissors Spock Lizard. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
  3. ^ Lovelace, David C. (2006-10-06). RPS-25. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
  4. ^ Lovelace, David C. (2006-10-06). RPS-101. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
  5. ^ World RPS Society (2002). The Myth of Dynamite Exposed. Retrieved on 2007-11-09.)
  6. ^ Ultimate Players Association (2004-09-04). Ro-Sham-Bo (The Official UPA Rules). Retrieved on 2007-11-09.
  7. ^ Iona and Peter Opie. Children's Games in Street and Playground. Retrieved on 2008-03-10.
  8. ^ Sinervo, Barry (2001-02-20). The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  9. ^ "Exasperated judge resorts to child's game", Associated Press, 2006-06-26. Retrieved on 2006-08-20. 
  10. ^ Presnell, Gregory (June 7, 2006). Order of the court: Avista Management vs. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.. CNN.com. Retrieved on 2006-06-08.
  11. ^ Art/Auctions logo, Impressionist & Modern Art, Christie's, 7PM, May 4, 2005, Sale 1514.
  12. ^ Vogel, Carol (April 29), “Rock, Paper, Payoff: Child's Play Wins Auction House an Art Sale”, New York Times, <http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/29/arts/design/29scis.html> 
  13. ^ Game Basics. World Rock Paper Scissors Society. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  14. ^ Hruby, Patrick. "Fists fly in game of strategy", Washington Times, 2004-12-10. Retrieved on 2006-08-20. 
  15. ^ "2003 World Rock Paper Scissors Championship", All Things Considered, National Public Radio, 2003-10-24. Retrieved on 2006-08-20. 
  16. ^ "Rock, Paper, Scissors A Sport?", CBS News, 2003-10-23. Retrieved on 2006-08-20. 
  17. ^ "Rock Paper Scissors contest being held", Associated Press, 2003-10-27. Retrieved on 2006-08-20. 
  18. ^ Park, Michael Y.. "Rock, Paper, Scissors, the Sport", Fox News, 2006-03-20. Retrieved on 2006-08-20. 
  19. ^ Gallery. World RPS society (2005-11-13). Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  20. ^ 2002 International Rock Paper Scissors Championships Official Results. World RPS society. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  21. ^ 2003 Championships Official Results. World RPS society. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  22. ^ 2004 Championships Official Results. World RPS society. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  23. ^ 2005 Championships Official Results. World RPS society. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
  24. ^ 2006 Championships Official Results. World RPS society. Retrieved on 2006-11-16.
  25. ^ 2007 Championships Official Results. World RPS society. Retrieved on 2007-10-15.
  26. ^ XTreme RPS Competition by Showtime Entertainment. Retrieved on 2007-01-07.

[edit] References

  • Alonzo, Suzanne H. & Sinervo, Barry (2001): Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology 49(2-3): 176–186. doi:10.1007/s002650000265 (HTML abstract)
  • Culin, Stewart (1895): Korean Games, With Notes on the Corresponding Games at China and Japan. (evidence of nonexistence of rock-paper-scissors in the West)
  • Gomme, Alice Bertha (1894, 1898): The traditional games of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 2 vols. (more evidence of nonexistence of rock-paper-scissors in the West)
  • Opie, Iona & Opie, Peter (1969): Children's Games in Street and Playground Oxford University Press, London. (Details some variants on rock-paper-scissors such as 'Man, Earwig, Elephant' in Indonesia, and presents evidence for the existence of 'finger throwing games' in Egypt as early as 2000 B.C.)
  • Sinervo, Barry (2001): Runaway social games, genetic cycles driven by alternative male and female strategies, and the origin of morphs. Genetica 112-113(1): 417-434. doi:10.1023/A:1013360426789  (HTML abstract)
  • Sinervo, Barry & Clobert, Jean (2003): Morphs, Dispersal Behavior, Genetic Similarity, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Science 300(5627): 1949-1951. doi:10.1126/science.1083109 (HTML abstract) Supporting Online Material
  • Sinervo, Barry & Lively, C. M. (1996): The Rock-Paper-Scissors Game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380: 240-243. doi:10.1038/380240a0 (HTML abstract)
  • Sinervo, Barry & Zamudio, K. R. (2001): The Evolution of Alternative Reproductive Strategies: Fitness Differential, Heritability, and Genetic Correlation Between the Sexes. Journal of Heredity 92(2): 198-205. PDF fulltext
  • Sogawa, Tsuneo (2000): Janken. Monthly Sinica 11(5). [Article in Japanese]
  • Walker, Douglas & Walker, Graham (2004): The Official Rock Paper Scissors Strategy Guide. Fireside. (RPS strategy, tips and culture from the World Rock Paper Scissors Society).

[edit] External links

v • d • e
Topics in game theory
Definitions
Equilibrium concepts
Strategies
Classes of games
Games
Theorems