User talk:Robrecht

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Noobelf 2 Subspecies 3 Autism 4 Dag 5 ABA

[edit] Noobelf

I redirected this page to Newbie, thus it does not need deleting anymore. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 01:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, much obliged. Robrecht 01:00, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Subspecies

What exactly is wrong with this page?Bignole 13:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

First off, you can hold off on the personal attacks there buddy. I don't know you and you don't know me, so don't insult me with rude comments. Secondly, I wrote that article when I was half asleep and never went back to proof it. I will go through each one and see what needs to be corrected. Bignole 15:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I went through and redrafted the page, word changes and such. But, what I find interesting is that there is no "and then and then" in that page. I kept looking for something that could be considered "a 10 year old" style but for the life of me I couldn't. There were some things that needed better word use, and I found a few typos, but nothing as drastic as you claimed. Bignole 15:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Autism

Hi, I was poking around wikipedia and had a couple of quick questions I think you would be able to answer quite well for me (if you're so inclined). I also noticed you like metal \m/ which is also quite the pwnage. Without wanting to sound like i'm criticising (I don't claim to be an expert, it's not my background) you mentioned briefly you feel the ABA treatments give rather pavlovian responses... I think this is quite a valid criticism personally. You also mentioned you feel it gives the person being "treated" no insight into background or context in the way other people might use it to formulate a natural response. What I am trying to get to is what led you to this particular insight? Was there something in particular that you learned to pick up maybe a little later in life? Crashvirus 07:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello again!
Thank you for your genuinely coherant and really fast reply!
made plenty of sense, and helped me to understand your points much better. I didn't think about the situation in that manner. Thanks again! Crashvirus 13:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dag

Ik ben een Amerikaanse autistiche wie beentje Nederlands praat (er zijn video-evidenties op YouTube). Ik vil "dank je" zegen voor jou contributies in het artikel "Applied behavior analysis". Dat artikel, lijk het is, is een andere exampel van de prejudicies van de neurotypikalen.

[edit] ABA

I've brought it up with two contributors to the Autism articles, User:Eubulides and User:SandyGeorgia. Sandy is an admin. We'll see what they say. WLU 01:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm happy with the wording currently in place thanks to SandyGeorgia. WLU 01:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

<undent>you claim to be an autist...and indicate that you don't think that autism is a 'disorder' -- I'm assuming, then, that you'd claim that autism has no negative effects on those that are diagnosed with it...am I correct in that assumption?Josh.Pritchard.DBA (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)