User talk:Robfwb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Robfwb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards 09:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ventrilo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ventrilo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- STBotI (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Ventrilo3.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Ventrilo.jpg. The copy called Image:Ventrilo.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. -- Staeckerbot (talk) 21:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
INFOTelevision
A tag has been placed on INFOTelevision, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 09:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: question
I'm assuming you're talking about INFOTelevision? If so, the answer is no. See the policies on neologisms and what Wikipedia is not for more information. east.718 at 09:25, December 18, 2007
[edit] March 2008
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Miley Cyrus. Most British people and many people internationally write dates in day-month-year order, e.g., 12 December 1904. Most Americans use month-day-year order, e.g., December 12, 1904. If the article is about an American topic, use month-day-year. If it is a British or European topic, use day-month-year. If neither, leave it as originally written. Many Americans or British people take offence if an article about their country, written in their local version of English, is changed around to a version they don't use. So please do not do that.
Dates are usually enclosed in two square brackets, as in [[12 December]] or [[December 12]]. This means that you can set your preferences (if you look around your screen you'll see the word preferences; click on it and follow the instructions) to ensure that you see all dates in the format you want, whether date-month-year, month-date-year or yyyy-mm-dd. The general rules on how Wikipedia articles are written can be seen in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Rules specific to dates and numbers can be seen in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers).
If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on the web's fastest growing encyclopædia (or encyclopedia, if you write it that way!). Thank you. NrDg 01:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Adding citations
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to WASJ. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. haz (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
(used to adding date's in that fashion)
Did some changes, station was affiliate w/ ESPN radio (not to be confused with the television network) Yes, this was verified by my ears and others on the radio-info.com forums)
Robfwb (talk) 22:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WAWD
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to WAWD appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. -- azumanga (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
One more thing -- as for telling others not to mess with the articles, please take the time to read WP:OWN -- anyone can edit them as they see fit, especially to conform with Wikipedia standards (especially WP:NPOV). -- azumanga (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
like i said before, it was a stub. it needed work. but by giving limited information about the station. trying to expand it tried to describe the programmes with as much details as possible. (though, the station is nothing more then 24 hour commercials gawd how f'n evil)
Robfwb (talk) 05:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)