User talk:Robertlondon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Robertlondon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — TKD::Talk 09:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:RodolfoMorales.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RodolfoMorales.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:RodolfoMoralesOrquestadelasMuchachas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RodolfoMoralesOrquestadelasMuchachas.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:MoorcroftEdwardiana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MoorcroftEdwardiana.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:MoorcrooftEdwardiana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MoorcrooftEdwardiana.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Apprentice UK

Image:Fired!.png Hello, Robertlondon. Are you a fan of The Apprentice UK? I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 18:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RodolfoMoralesAngeldeAnoranza.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RodolfoMoralesAngeldeAnoranza.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

Dear Robertlondon, I am sorry to inform you that I have failed Faile (artist collective) for GA status because of several issues, which are detailed on the article's talk page. If there are any comments you would like to make, or any questions you have about the failing of this article, then please forward them to my talk page. Good luck for a future candidacy. Regards,


-- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

Hi again. Firstly, about the email - there is not much to be done. Unless you can find independant, verifiable sources, that content remains unreferenced. Secondly, I would start a post on either the users talk page, or the articles talk page discussing the external link. See what he thinks and what others say. Take it from there. I hope I have been able to help a bit. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 17:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jimboleen1 coments

I moved your comments to his talk page as i think this is where most people are going to look. Hope you dont mind :)

3tmx 18:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Basically next time he adds a spam link he gets a final warning template. You've been very patient with him , but he 's totally ignored your warnings 3tmx 22:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: The Restaurant (UK television series)

Hi there, thanks for your comment. Whilst it's not my intention to upset the regular editors of the article, such as yourself, the changes I implemented were needed for clarity, functionality and to replace the large amounts of original research present in the article as it was. As for the table, I'd contest your view that it is isn't an improvement - combined with the episode guide this is far more through synopsis of the series than was previously in place. I agree it was probably naive of me to hope that other editors would help fill in the contestant profiles, but this is a wiki after all. You only need to look at articles such as The Apprentice (UK Series Three), which I recently played a major part in bringing up to GA standard, to see that these changes are for the better. If it turns out that there is consensus to revert to the older version then feel free to do so. Seaserpent85 15:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi again! I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding here - from what I saw the article had only just passed the stub stage, with certain sections needing some definite attention. The article as it was before had nowhere to include information about the contestants, therefore I added sections which are free to be expanded, unlike the previous table - I think this is quite a logical step forward, however I do agree I should have checked that I wasn't removing information as I did this. That aside, I'm getting the impression that the newer table is the main concern here - if it bothers you that much I don't mind you getting rid of it. Personally, I feel it provides the reader with a breakdown of the series - showing how often couples are in challenges or get restaurant of the week. But in the scale of things, this is a very minor part of the article, there are sections I could probably put time into improving - for example, moving most of the lead into a Format section and an inclusion of a Reception section. There's no need for you to apologise, I understand it's frustrating when your hard work gets rewritten - I'd probably have reacted in a similar way! Hope that clears it up a bit, look forward to maybe one day seeing the article at GA status :) Seaserpent85 10:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RodolfoMorales.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RodolfoMorales.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Eine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ben Eine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ben Eine. 12 Noon 2¢ 15:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Ben Eine

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ben Eine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Eine. Thank you. 12 Noon 2¢ 00:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Emma Bossons

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Emma Bossons, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Emma Bossons. Willirennen (talk) 00:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Emma Bossons

An article that you have been involved in editing, Emma Bossons, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Bossons (2nd nomination). Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 03:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)