From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Blueboy96 17:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "see below"
Decline reason: "Even if you're not confirmed to be a sockpuppet of that particular user, your actions and those of other accounts are enough to prove that you have been abusing multiple accounts to continue your harassment of other users. Your actions are the ones that are taken into consideration here, not those of others. -Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
Why was I blocked? I was proven not to be a sockpupppet by [1] It states in that checkuser Unrelated and no geographic relationship to MKF's.
I was being harrassed to the left and right by Robotam and Miranda. Who have been forum shopping to get me blocked. I haven't had any major edits in two weeks (though I have edited). [2] [3] [4]
[5]
They open up case after case against me [6]
[7]
[8] [9]
[10]
Miranda has a long history of harrassing other users [11] I saw this [12]
Other admins have stated that they consider my contributions positive [13] . While stating that other people blocked havent edited in a while. [14] and were also proven inconclusive.
In the checkuser according to Thatcher [15] Mykungfu and his suspected socks are in the NYC metro area. I am not in that area. Go thru any IP I have used and you will see that. No one travels at light speed as Robotam and Miranda would have you believe with all the sockpuppets that they claim exist. Again I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. RobertOgleFan (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Your excuse and soapboxing are interesting, MKF. So why did a IP from CUNY revert the sockpuppet notice if you are not from the NYC area? miranda 19:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "This is madness! I was blocked as being a sockpuppet of Mykungfu. Someone please clear that up. Hersfold, states that I was abusing multiple accounts, I am stating that I am not. I have not stated one negative thing about Miranda but I am stating that I am being harrassed. Even after being vindicated by checkuser. I have not used another account at all. Where has my behavior ever been said to be uncivil. Look at my contribution history! What actions of mine were taken into consideration. I can't be held responsible for other people who I don't know. Some idiot (Hadsomefun) goes on my page and makes an accusation against Miranda 1 hour after I request for an unblock. Where is Hadsomefun located? File a checkuser with me and Hadsomefun. As he put on my talk page. This along with the other checkuser will I don't use multiple accounts. Can you please look into this, someone? Look at my evidence provided above as well for an overall unblock."
Decline reason: "Per comments and evidence below. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
It's curious, then, that Hadsomefun was posting on this page [16] [17] [18] [19] with some of the same evidence you were using to defend yourself. Your accounts were created within four days of each other, and somehow noticed you're blocked almost immediately after you do, despite having no reason to be involved in the situation at all. Please also note that checkuser is rarely used to prove your own innocence as you are asking. Hersfold (t/a/c) 12:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
