Talk:Robot kinematics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robot kinematics is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, an attempt to standardise coverage of Robotics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Redundant article?See Robot control and Talk:Robot control--Sahodaran 11:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. Also redundant in view of the updated version of Robot that I am still working on, and kinematics. I propose adding a little bit of info to Robot control to ensure this phrase is covered and then redirecting to there. 16:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
What about Robot locomotion? Is it necessary to merge, or are their differences important to hair-splitting robotisists? - Jak (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I think it's necessary to make the difference between control, dynamics and kinematics very clear. Without the knowledge of the kinematic and dynamic structure of the robot it's almost impossible to control it. I think the Robot control page also needs an update since for example the denavit hartenberg convention has not much to do with control theory. RobotNick 15 december 2006

I'm thinking about the best way to divide this article in sections. Maybe it's better to make the forward kinematics and inverse kinematics etc the title of the sections and divide these for the different robot types instead of the way it's organised now? RobotNick 15 december 2006