Talk:RoboCop 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Excuse me, but the "criticism" section is by all means not NPOV. - Sikon 17:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Agreed. This is an encyclopedia, not a movie review site. - --195.137.96.86 20:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Yes, that I see... But... What is NPOV?
'Neutral Point of View'. See WP:NPOV. I've fixed it. Proto t c 09:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
"Film Noir meets the Blade Runner"? Did you write this yourself? Wasn't Blade Runner in a sort of film noir style? And just how exactly is a cyborg cop film noir? Dessydes 19:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Who exactly criticised the film for not giving enough political philosophy to the neighbourhood people? I refuse to believe that any critic would be so pedantic on philosophy as that unless someone puts a reference up. Even then, the critic needs to be credited by name rather than having "some critics say".
- As of now I am removing all criticism for a complete lack of citation. Criticism sections are really only for cited criticisms from large fan bases, industry professionals, or actual critics.--Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 23:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ken Strong acting from the grave?
This movie lists Ken Strong as part of the cast , but he died in 1979. IMDb Profile [1] Perhaps a different person?
[edit] Robocop 4
What proof is their that Robocop 4 was to be titles Fight for the future? I have never heard of this, and am a fairly avid Robo fan. While I have heard about Robocop 4 being considered I have never read anywhere where this title is mentioned, and this is the first time I have ever hear the name at all.