Talk:Robert Zajonc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, which collaborates on Psychology and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.

I propose that this article also mentions the confluence theory of Zajonc and Markus (1975). This could be the basis of a wiki-link between this article and that on birth order, an article which could do with some amendment, updating and editing. A reciprocal wiki-link, if this information were added, would solve some of the concerns I have about the article on birth order. ACEO 20:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry, obscure sentence

the more likely they would be to recognise the object and must form their own attitude about the stimulus by thinking about it : this is a very confused sentence. Could someone clarify this ? --Anne97432 15:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)