Talk:Robert Wilkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review Robert Wilkins has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Wilkins article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Disputed

"Rolling Stone" (covered by Muddy Waters and which inspired The Rolling Stones very name)

I just spent a few hours researching the song "Catfish Blues" by Robert Petway and it's possible relationship to "Rollin Stone" by Muddy Waters. I spent so much time that I even made an article for Petway and made a section covering the dispute over whether the Peyton song was the source of the Muddy Waters song. From what I can tell, Rev. Wilkinson's song "Rolling Stone" came out in 1928, so it certainly is early than the either two songs, but when the lyrics of each song are compared, the only thing I see in common between "Rolling Stone" and "Rollin' Stone" is the title. Please compare the "Rolling Stone" lyrics and the "Rollin' Stone" lyrics. I hesitate to make the edit right out, since the past few hours of research have taught me that there is a lot of ambiguity and uncertainty in the early history of the blue. But unless some source can be cited that shows some evidence that the two songs are related and don't just have the same name, the line needs to be removed. Crazytonyi 08:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I removed the reference as its unsourced. dissolvetalk 22:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Robert Wilkins.jpg

Image:Robert Wilkins.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)