Talk:Robert Sternberg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of education and education-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to featured and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. |
| Portal | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 Portal |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, which collaborates on Psychology and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
|
||||||||
Contents |
[edit] no references
There were no references supporting any of the claims that Sternberg's ideas lack empirical support. Further the name invoked as a critic (without reference) is hardly qualified to criticize Sternberg's work.
Additional references now added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikikoo (talk • contribs) 10:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Assess (Education)
This is referenced or is referenced by impication on the Education page ... therefore mid importance (might be high?) Victuallers 13:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Where on earth does it say he's married to his third wife? If that's true it's pretty ironic for a guy who writes about love, but come on -- i can't find ANYTHING about that listed anywhere else on the internet. The only pages that talk about his wife(s) link to this page. Archtemplar 10:07, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Creatology
I've just removed the unsourced claim that "Sternberg has proposed to apply the name creatology to scientific studies of creativity." While searching for a ref, Google led to me to this page in which Sternberg, with reference to this very WP article, explicitly declaims coining the term. I don't know if this is somebody's pet theory or what, but I'm posting this in case the claim is re-added. --zenohockey 15:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Link to biography is not working. Should be http://provost.tufts.edu/1174149600661/Provost-Page-prov2w_1174149600774.html but will let someone else change --not registered as user 121.44.212.218 12:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC) This is now fixed ... curious as to why 121.44.212.218 didn't log in... Mr Stromberg?? Victuallers 17:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sternberg.png
Image:Sternberg.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Theory of Intelligence - Practical Application
Whoever was the last contributor added "This is all a lie." without reference to the end of the Practical Application section. I'm a newbie so won't attempt to edit, but wanted to call attention to that unsubstantiated and vague remark.
G+SHancock (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
