Talk:Robert Neuman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] CSD

I originally deleted this as SPEEDY, but with my knowledge it has been recreated with some additional material, though I have given no assurance that this will merit its retention. Tyrenius 13:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] prod

I have removed the prod tag, because i consider the article to adequately show N (it was never a valid speedy, though I can understand prod. ). Full professors at major universities, & F.State counts as one now, are N. their Notability has been validated by the process of peer review by other scholars, and that is sufficient. & the official web site is the adequate documentation. Of course one wants to say more, & more can generally be found, but people in the humanities have many fewer (but lengthier) publication records than in the sciences. (I am not the same person who worked on the article previously--this is entirely independent of previous discussions about the article. I am going to add a little more, but I think the article is defendable as is). DGG 03:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)