Talk:Robert F. Kennedy assassination/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Remove Iranian theory
Moved from article space by Vicki Rosenzweig 22:09, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC):
"This is written off the top of my head, some details may not be exact. Please add details as known. The assanation was completed by the Iranian Savak. The method was a camera that had four small gun barrels hidden within the lens. Sirhan was designated to asail Mr. Kennedy within the confines of the pantry area should Mr. Kennedy choose to exit through there. The confirmation for the hit was the presence of the photographer in the bright yellow sweater. Sirhan began to fire, was overcome as bullets sprayed about, and in doing so provided the diversion that allowed the photographer to close in and fire at point blank range with the gun/lens at the back of Mr. Kennedy's skull. The film will bear out the sequence of events, including the oddly close proximity the yellowed sweatered photographer maintained on Mr. Kennedy's flank. Additional details cannot be made available at this time, safe to say this was a failsafe operation that could have followed many paths to the same result. TT0007"
- Photographer? I thought it was supposed to be Cesar.
- I never have found out how an 8-shot pistol with someone's thumb behind its trigger delivered 11 slugs.
- New book, out, BTW: ISBN 0060580534 It has Robert Vaughn's endorsement[1] (whoopee) =p Kwantus 17:40, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)
[edit] Angles don't support Sirhan
Someone should add that another key support for a second gunman is that the angles of entry for the bullets don't match with Sirhan's direction at all.
[edit] disturbing coins
There are some disturbing coins under the picture of Kennedy... perhaps they should be removed, but I 'stole' it from Robert F. Kennedy. Pascal 22:18, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC)
- The coins pictured in the article are of the special dollar coin that the US Government produced in honor of RFK in the late 90's. I'll remove them, since they have nothing to do with the RFK assassination itself. Unlike the Kennedy Half, the RFK silver dollar wasn't produced in honor of RFK after his death, they were done as a fund raiser for a charity named after RFK AFAIK.
- Hope this helps!
- PS: The Government stopped minting special silver dollars in the 50's until 1982.
- hoshie 14:24, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Bizarre
I'm somewhat astonished to see that none of you have picked up the most recent news that George Campbell and David Morales have now been positively identified as being present at the Ambassador Hotel the night RFK was murdered.
This is basically The Smoking Gun.
Check the news, slowcoaches!Iamlondon 17:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What is the deal with Muslim?
Why does the fact that Sirhan Sirhan was a Christian not a Muslim have any relevance to whether the PLO was involved? Why are you putting it back? Are you an anti-Muslim who believes that only Muslims can be PLO terrorists? In which case that is very POV and not appropriate for this page.Dabbler 18:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
The article plainly states that Sirhan could have been acting independently, not at the behest of any larger organization. You are looking for bias where none exists.
The Sirhan Sirhan article states that he changed religions several times in his later life, yet this article states that he was a lifelong Roman Catholic. Which is correct?
[edit] Another scenario
Another possible scenario - when Sirhan started shooting, one of the security guards drew his revolver & accidentally shot Kennedy. I believe Sirhan would still be legally guilty of murder if such were the case--JimWae 07:34, 2005 July 17 (UTC)
This seems at least as likely as any conspiracy --JimWae 23:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A news article about this page!
"SAN FRANCISCO - Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that allows anyone to contribute articles, is tightening its rules for submitting entries following the disclosure that it ran a piece falsely implicating a man in the Kennedy assassinations. Wikipedia will now require users to register before they can create articles, Jimmy Wales, founder of the St. Petersburg, Fla.-based Web site, said Monday.[2]" Is it true? --tequendamia 23:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Mel Ayton article
i read this article is it a good source to put in there? he cites zero evidence. most of it sounds completely made up. things like this are a dead give away:
"The propaganda used by Palestinians had no less an effect on the younger generations of children from the 1940s to the present day. From an early age Sirhan had been taught by educators, family members, and friends that the Jews were "treacherous," "an evil enemy" and it was his "duty" to rid Jews from Palestine. Sirhan's generation was taught to hate, despise, and fear Jews, to believe that it was not only right for every self-respecting Arab to fight the Jewish state and that it was just and desirable to destroy it. Undoubtedly, this milieu of hatred had an intense effect on Sirhan as he grew up."
he doesn't cite a source for this. he's making up an opinion about something that happened in 1940. right before that he compares the palestinians to Nazis. more of the same:
"Sirhan's irrational hatred and anger towards the Jews did not originate with any mental illness he may have suffered. In fact, his attitude was no different from that of the majority of Palestinians and the rest of the Arab peoples. His ideas were entirely rational within the norms of the Arab world."
so here Sirhan's motivation is that all arabs are antisemitic. it's ridiculous.
i'm taking that part out.
[edit] Page discusses conspiracy theories more than Actual Assassination
This page is in danger of turning into the "Robert F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories" page. I'm not against these alternative theories being on the page, as they are thought-inspiring, but they overwhelm the basic function of the page, which is to present the facts about RFK's assassination. The "official" story of the shooting is almost sidelined by all the paragraphs devoted to convincing the reader that the official recorded facts are unreliable.
Additionally, almost all the links are to "Alternate Theories" of dubious reliability.
Again, I don't mind these theories being on the page, but ought they not to be balanced with more facts from the "official" version? Woodson 04:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For example, more links to eyewitness testimony, and the presented facts of the case, would at least better represent what is claimed to have happened, so that readers can better separate the official story from the conspiracy/"second-man"/Manchurian Candidate assertions. Woodson 20:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Page Full of Errors
Conspiracy theories are one thing, but having honest intellectual debate about this subject is another. This page tends to give too much credence to conspiracy and not enough to actual facts. At one point, the athor says that, "there is no record of RFK supporting Israel during that period." In fact, there is evidence to RFK's support of Israel. When Sirhan Sirhan was processed, two newspaper clippings were found in his pocket. One of them was from the Pasadena Independent Star News, dated June 2. There is also much reason to believe that Sirhan Sirhan wanted RFK to die. The best evidence of this fact can be found on a page in Sirhan's notebook. He writes, "RFK must die- RFK must be killed. Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated... Robert F. Kennedy must assassinated before 5 June 68." The whole page is dedicated to this mantra. Author Dan E Moldea concludes his book The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy with a story related to him by author Michael McCowan, which goes as follows: "Suddenly, in the midst of their conversation, Sirhan started to explain the moment when his eyes met Kennedy's just before he shot him.
Shocked by what Sirhan had just admitted, McCowan asked,'Then why, Sirhan, didn't you shoot him between the eyes?' With no hesitation and no apparent remorse, Sirhan replied,'Because that son of a bitch turned his head at the last second.'"
If this appaling admission isn't enough to convict Sirhan, then I don't know what will. To admit conspiracy is to absolve Sirhan of his crime of murdering an important individual that had the potential to alter the course of American history. This page ought to be dedicated to upholding the facts and conclusions that place blame on the guily party and give the proper respect to the slain Kennedy. Dissent is cool 23:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Dissent Is Cool
As to the "RFK must die" journal entry, there have been a number of handwriting experts who have claimed that the handwriting for this entry does NOT match Sirhan's handwriting for any other entries in that journal. Plus the question of why Sirhan, who only had a grade school education, would have used English phrases like "unshakeable obsession". These issues should be discussed further.
And, while RFK may have been a supporter of Israel, so was EVERY OTHER Democratic candidate, as was the Democratic incumbent, Lyndon Johnson, AND all the Republican candidates of that year. The only serious 1968 presidential candidate who could accurately have been described as "anti-Israel" was segregationist third-party candidate George Wallace(the candidate, for whatever it may be worth, that Thane Cesar later admitted to supporting).
Therefore, there was nothing in RFK's position on Israel that would have marked him for death in Sirhan's eyes any more than any other major party candidate of that year.
And the one thing that opponents of the idea of a conspiracy to shoot RFK STILL have never adequately addressed is the finding of Dr. Noguchi in his autopsy of RFK that the fatal shot was fired from behind, at an upward "nearly verticle" angle and at point-blank range. Sirhan was NEVER in position to have fired this shot. Sirhan was in position, however, to have inflicted the non-fatal wounds suffered by the other shooting victims that evening. Ken Burch 11:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Ken Burch
I agree with the above poster.Who edits this garbage? Entries for this subject must rank as one of the most biased and undersourced I have ever read.You quote me in part but ignore my research about Shane O'Sullivan's ridiculous RKK/CIA allegations and Steve Barber's article about the acoustics evidence which is challenges everything about the new Discovery Times documentary - see below -
You omit so much it is difficult to know where to start - perhaps here - where you will find further books and information which challenge your conspiracy-minded editor:
http://hnn.us/articles/32193.html
http://hnn.us/articles/38496.html
http://hnn.us/articles/36915.html
You may also wish to add the following to your paragraph on the Discovery Times documentary, in which I appear - and you mention in a recent addition to the entry:
There are a number of issues which the Discovery Times program did not take into account:
- Conspiracists do not understand the differences in the qualifications of the experts interviewed for the documentary. Unlike Philip Van Praag and Wes Dooley, who are, essentially, audio engineers, Philip Harrison is a professional acoustics expert who works for a professional acoustics firm, JP French Associates.
- Conspiracists are misrepresenting the provenance and quality of the digitized version of the tape used by Barber and Harrison. They comment that Harrison did not have access to the ‘Master Tapes’. Van Praag had this to say about the copy of the digitized version sent to Steve Barber who in turn forwarded it to Philip Harrison, “The copy I made for you resulted from a request to me from the CSA, asking if I would do them a favor by responding to their requestor (Mel Ayton) regarding his desire to obtain a copy of better quality than the stock cassettes that the CSA normally provides…….. I did not apply any filtering to the recording you obtained from me. The transcription I made utilized the FINEST studio professional console analog equipment for playback (quite necessary), along with multiple digital and analog machines on the record side.” After examining the digitized version of the tape Steve characterized it as “…identical to the cassette in every way, except that it is much clearer.” Digitized copies lose nothing in the transaction.
- Conspiracy bloggers are misrepresenting the teams of acoustics experts and purported acoustics experts who have examined the Pruszynski Tape. They allege that three experts say there were more than 8 shots and one expert dissents. This mischaracterizes the truth of the matter.
Philip Harrison, together with Professor Peter French, a lecturer in acoustics at the University of York examined the Pruszynski Tape and found no more than 8 shots recorded on it. In the United States, audio expert Steve Barber and Michael O’Dell and Dr Chad Zimmerman, who have a wealth of experience researching the scientific aspects of the JFK assassination, also examined the tape and found no more than 8 shots. Both teams had independently examined the tape then Barber and Harrison consulted with each other. We can eliminate the ‘Dutch’acoustics expert as no scientific journal in the world would accept findings from an anonymous source.
We thus have three experts in the United States, Philip van Praag, Wes Dooley and his assistant, who examined the tape and who concluded there were 10 or 13 shots fired and five experts in the US and UK who found no more than the acoustic signatures of 8 shots fired. Philip Harrison provided a written report of his findings. Steve Barber was interviewed for my book and his comments about his research is included within the narrative of my book. The Discovery Times Channel ‘teams’ have produced no written report. It should be quite obvious to EVERY person in the scientific community that Van Praag’s and Wes Dooley’s findings can never be accepted without publication of their research for peer review. (No scientific journal in the world will accept anything the so-called Danish expert has to say whilst he remains anonymous.)
- Van Praag’s comment to Steve Barber following the broadcast of the Discovery Times documentary (“Until I finish sorting it out …..a day, a week, a month…”) reveals how Van Praag did not complete his research into the tape but had the audacity to present his half-cocked findings to viewers.
Mel Ayton
[edit] Some information from the FBI review of the Sirhan Sirhan trial:
All info below taken from the 1977 review by Thomas F. Kranz, Special Counsel to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. [3]
(from page 3) In an indictment returned by the Grand Jury of Los Angeles County, defendant Sirhan was charged in Count I with the murder of Robert Francis Kennedy in violation of Penal Code Section 187. In Counts II - VI defendant Sirhan was charged with assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder of Paul Schrade, Owen Stroll, William Weisel, Elizabeth Evans, and Ira Goldstein, in violation of Penal Code Section 217. Defendant Sirhan pleaded not guilty. The trial court denied defendant's motion for separate juries on the issue of guilt and the possible issue of penalty was denied. Defendant's motion to quash and set aside the petit jury list was denied, as was his motion to quash the indictment. After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty as charged on all counts, the jury fixing the degree of the offense charged in Count I at murder in the first degree. After further proceedings on the issue of penalty, the jury fixed the punishment on Count I at death. The defendant filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction, and the California Supreme Court modified the judgment to provide a punishment of life imprisonment instead of death for the murder of Senator Kennedy.
(from page 5) Earlier in the year, Sirhan had had a conversation with Alvin Clark, a trash collector employed by the City of Pasadena, in which Sirhan had expressed his concern about how the assassination of Martin Luther King would effect "Negro people and how the Negroes would vote in the coming election." Clark testified at trial that he told Sirhan he was going to vote for Senator Kennedy and Sirhan responded by saying, "What do you want to vote for that son-of-a-b for? Because I'm planning on shooting him" Clark then told Sirhan that Senator Kennedy had paid the expenses of bringing Martin Luther King's body back from Tennessee and that "you will be killing one of the best men in the country." Clark remembered that Sirhan stated that Senator Kennedy had done this merely for the publicity involved, and that this conversation had occured in mid-April, 1968.
(from page 6) While Sirhan was being held in the pantry awaiting the arrival of the L.A.P.D., Rafter Johnson asked Sirhan repeatedly, "why did you do it?" Sirhan replied, "Let me explain" or "I can explain." At this time Sirhan also remarked in answer to Jess Unruh's question "Why him?", "I did it for my country," and a few seconds later, "It is too late".
Sirhan's pockets were emptied and the following items were taken from his possession: an automobile key, two live .22 caliber bullets and an expended bullet, two newspaper clippings (one from the Pasadena Independent Star News dated May 26, 1968, a story by columnist David Lawrence which in part noted noted that in a recent speech Senator Kennedy had "favored aid to Israel with arms if necessary."; the other newspaper clipping, an advertisement from an unidentified newspaper inviting the public "to come and see and hear Senator Robert Kennedy on Sunday, June 2, 1968, at 8:00 p.m., Coconut Grove, Ambassador Hotel, Los Angeles"). Also removed from Sirhan's pockets was $410.66 in cash, including four one hundred dollar bills. No wallet, identification, or information indicating Sirhan's identity was obtained from the examination of Sirhan's person.
(from page 9) diary - notebook found on the top of Sirhan's dresser, which Mr. Laurence Sloan, employed in the District Attorney's Office as specialist in handwriting and questioned documents, identified as having been written by Sirhan. These pages read in part as follows: "May 18, 9:45 a.m./68 - My determination to eliminate R.F.K. is becoming more and more of an unshakeable obsession... R.F.K. must die...R.F.K. must be killed...Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated before 5 June 68..."
Other quotes taken from these pages were the following: "Ambassador Golberg must die"..."Ambassador Goldberg must be eliminated...Sirhan is and Arab" "Kennedy must fall (underlined), Kennedy must fall...Senator R. Kennedy must be sacrificed for the cause of the poor exploited people..."
(from page 10) (taken from glove compartment of Sirhan's car) a wallet containing among other things, current membership card in Sirhan's name in the Ancient Mystical Order of Rosacrucian, as well as other cards identifying Sirhan by name and address
Evidence introduced at trial established that at 8:00 a.m. Police Department arrived at the Sirhan residence, having been assigned to security at the rear of the residence to guard the premises from unauthorized persons. At approximately 11:00 a.m., upon discarding a paper cup of coffee into the trash which lay inside several boxes and cans of trash on the Sirhan property, he observed an envelope which bore on its face the return address of the Argonaut Insurance Company. Mr. Laurence Sloan, handwriting specialist of the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, testified that the writing on the back of the envelope was that of Sirhan. The following words, repeated several times, were written on the reverse side of the envelope, which had been put in evidence by the prosecution: "R.F.K. must be...disposed of properly. Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy must soon die."
Other trial evidence introduced was testimony of Mr. and Mrs. John Weidner, the owners of a health food store in Pasadena, who had employed Sirhan as a box boy and delivery boy. The weidners had discussions with Sirhan on the subject of politics in which Sirhan asserted that violence was the only means by which American Negroes would achieve their goals, and that the state of Israel had taken his home, and that the Jewish people were on top and directing the events in America. When Sirhan stated to the Weidners that there was more freedom in Russia and China than America, Mr. Weidner had inquired, "Why don't you go there yourself?" Sirhan replied, "Maybe one day I will go."
(from page 11) Sirhan stated at trial that he "read everything about the Arab-Israeli situation that he could lay his hands on," including publications from the Arab information center in the United States and a book on Zionist influence on U.S. policy in the Middle East.
One book read by Sirhan, entitled Cyclomancy(underlined), was described by Sirhan as follows: "The basis of what he says is you can do anything with your mind if you know how"..."how you can install a thought in your mind and how you can have it work and becom reality if you want it to." One Rosicrucian article read by Sirhan taught him that if he wrote something down, he would accomplish his goal. Sirhan testified that he had recorded various things in his notebook "with the objective in mind of accomplishing his goals...and in reference to that, the assassination of Robert Kennedy."
(from page 12) At trial, Sirhan admitted writing on May 18, 1968, that his "determination to eliminate R.F.K. is becoming more the more of an unshakeable obsession...(and that he could have written this at the time Senator Kennedy had said he would send 50 planes to Israel.
During the two weeks prior to the assassination, .... After finishing his several hours of shooting at the gun range, Sirhan had dinner at a Pasadena restaurant and observed a newspaper ad which read, "Join in the miracle mile march, for Israel." Sirhan testified that "this advertisement brought him back to the six days in June of the previous year, and that the fire started burning inside of him as a result of the ad."
When Sirhan saw a sign for United States Senator Kuchel's Headquarters, he dropped by and was told that a large party for Senator Kuchel was going on at the Ambassador Hotel. When Sirhan walked toward the hotel, with his gun still in the automobile, he observed a large sign concerning some Jewish organization and Sirhan testified that this "boiled him up again."
(from page 13) Out of the presence of the jury, Sirhan screamed to the trial court "I killed Robert Kennedy willfully, premeditatively, with 20 years of malice aforethought." Additionally, Sirhan stated, "I'm willing to fight for (the Arab cause)...I'm willing to die for it."
In front of the jury, on re-direct examination, Sirhan explained the circumstances under which he had declared that he had killed Senator Kennedy with malice aforethought. He had stated that at the time, outside the presence of the jury, had informed the court, "I at this time, Sir, withdraw my original plea of not guilty and submit the ple of guilty as charged on all counts. I also request that my counsel disassociate themselves from this case completely." Sirhan stated in front of the jury that he was "boiling" at this time. And when the trial court asked him "alright, and what do you want to do about the penalty," Sirhan had responded, again outside the presence of the jury, "I will offer no defense whatsoever...I will ask to be executed, Sir." The trial court had refused to accept the plea and had ordered the trial to proceed, finding Sirhan incapable of representing himself. Thereafter, Sirhan's mother and Mr. Nakhleh, a Palestinian Arab attorney serving as a defense advisor, had spoken with Sirhan and had given him advice. Sirhan had agreed to proceed with the trial represented by his counsel, once they agreed not to call the two girls as witnesses.
(from page 17) (Summary of Trial Evidence) It is clear from the record that there was abundant evidence of premeditation and deliberation of first degree murder. Sirhan had purchased the murder weapon almost six months prior to the assassination that Sirhan was "planning on shooting that son-of-a-bitch Senator Kennedy", and Sirhan's stalking of Kennedy, all reflected by Sirhan's own testimony added substance to this conclusion. Additionally, Sirhan's trip to the shooting range, his visit to the Ambassador Hotel two days prior to the assassination, and his conduct immediately prior to the assassination, including his asking of questions relative to Senator Kennedy's intended route and security protection, including his statements after the assassination that he could "explain" and committed his act "for my country," and his possession on his person of clippings relative to Senator Kennedy and the Senator's favorable position towards Israel, all added to evidence of premeditated murder. Finally, in front of the jury, Sirhan admitted that during a courtroom outburst while the jury was absent, he had stated, "I killed Robert Kennedy willfully, premeditatedly, and with 20 years of malice aforethought."
Emobiles 13:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC) The article found in Sirhan's pocket revealing Kennedy's preference towards arms sales to Israel was from the Pasadena Independent Star News dated May 26, 1968 but Sirhan was quoted from his diary of May 18th. expressing his desire to kill Kennedy for his arms support for Israel. How did Sirhan know before the press made it public, Kennedy's preference?
[edit] Page discusses conspiracy theories more than Actual Assassination
This page is in danger of turning into the "Robert F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories" page. I'm not against these alternative theories being on the page, as they are thought-inspiring, but they overwhelm the basic function of the page, which is to present the facts about RFK's assassination. The "official" story of the shooting is almost sidelined by all the paragraphs devoted to convincing the reader that the official recorded facts are unreliable.
Additionally, almost all the links are to "Alternate Theories" of dubious reliability.
Again, I don't mind these theories being on the page, but ought they not to be balanced with more facts from the "official" version? Woodson 04:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For example, more links to eyewitness testimony, and the presented facts of the case, would at least better represent what is claimed to have happened, so that readers can better separate the official story from the conspiracy/"second-man"/Manchurian Candidate assertions. Woodson 20:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Autopsy
Sirhan's gun was placed by all witnesses at between 2 and 5 feet from the Senator when he fired his revolver. [8] All witnesses seemed to agree Sirhan was facing Kennedy when he fired.
In conducting the autopsy on Kennedy, Los Angeles coroner Dr. Thomas Noguchi found powder stippling on Kennedy's ear and gunpowder residue (including soot) in his hair. Noguchi said this indicated that Kennedy was shot from a distance of, at most, 1.5 inches (37 millimeters.) (When a firearm is discharged, the soot component of the gunpowder residue travels only a few inches because the material is very light.) Noguchi and fellow investigators confirmed autopsy impressions by experimental test firings conducted at the Police Academy shooting range. Noguchi's conclusions led to speculation that Sirhan was too far from Kennedy and in the wrong position to have administered the fatal shot (also fired from a .22 caliber handgun, one which had apparently been fired into Kennedy's head at point-blank range from behind his right ear) and that a second shooter must have been present. Dr. Noguchi wrote years later that:
“ Until more is precisely known…the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility. Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy. ” — Dr. Noguchi [9][10]
Independent testing (shown in a 2004 "Unsolved History" series program on the Discovery Channel) indicates that gunpowder residue from a similar weapon and similar ammunition can easily travel over 15 inches (38 cm), but that the stippling effect observed requires that the muzzle of the gun must have been less than 2 inches (5 cm) away. 159.71.254.248 (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] In need of a major clean up:
Looking at the assassinations of both JFK and RFK I came on this article and must say it is in need of serious clean up. The Legacy section has a insane and I might had inane amount of citation needed notes peppered through out it. The idea that one needs a citation on things like the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King and the violence at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago is on par with needing a citation to the statement the sky is blue. Time to use a little restraint and some common sense.--BruceGrubb 12:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Undue Weight
There is a lot of undue weight accorded to conspiracy theories in this article, and the extremely dubious program Conspiracy Test is not a great source for a huge section. The conspiracy theory stuff, and in particular the stuff from that program, needs to be pruned considerably. Titanium Dragon (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
It would now appear that the only thing "extremely dubious" here are the above unfortunate comments made by an obviously less than objective Wiki reader, unduly weighted down by personal agenda. For, as it now turns out, the results of Philip Van Praag's analysis of the Pruszynski recording, reported in the excellent Discovery Times Channel program, "Conspiracy Test: The RFK Assassination", have just been formally submitted for peer review to the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, the world's most prestigious forensic science organization and hardly, in any sense of the word, "dubious". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.97.232 (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
The American Academy of Forensics science has not validated Van Praag's work in any way whatsoever. They invited him to make a presentation. It is a lie to imply they have endorsed his work.
MR. AYTON, YOUR LONG-ESTABLISHED EFFORTS TO PROMOTE YOURSELF ARE DULY NOTED. BUT YOUR RED HERRING ABOVE IS PATHETIC. THE ONLY THING THAT HAS BEEN STATED ON THIS PAGE ABOVE, AS YOU WELL KNOW, IS THAT VAN PRAAG'S WORK HAS BEEN FORMALLY SUBMITTED FOR PEER REVIEW BY THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FORENSIC SCIENCES. THAT'S ALL THAT HAS BEEN STATED OR IMPLIED (DESPITE YOUR EFFORTS HERE TO TRY TO SUGGEST THAT ANYTHING MORE THAN THAT HAS BEEN STATED OR IMPLIED). PLEASE TRY TO BE FACTUAL FOR ONCE.
In fact there is little chance they will endorse his work because of the following information - http://hnn.us/articles/44466.html
The documentary challenged the Pruszynski Tape acoustics research carried out by two teams of experts -- Philip Harrison and Professor Peter French of J P French Associates in the UK and Steve Barber, Dr Chad Zimmerman and Michael O’Dell in the US -- for Mel Ayton. Note - Van Praag was an 'audio engineer' Harrison is an acoustics expert.These are two very different fields of science.
From the acosutics article "J P French Associates is the United Kingdom’s longest established independent forensic speech and acoustics laboratory. The company prepares reports for the defense and prosecution in criminal cases on speaker identification, transcription, authentication and enhancement of recordings, acoustic investigation, and other related areas, including the analysis of recorded gun shots, and is regularly involved in some of the most important and high profile cases in the United Kingdom and around the world."
"Philip Harrison has worked on over one thousand such cases. Harrison analyzed the Pruszynski Tape using three different methods, both independently and simultaneously. These involved (1) listening analytically to the recording via high quality headphones, (2) examining visual representations of the recording’s waveform (oscillographic displays), and (3) analyzing spectrograms (plots of sound energy across frequency over time), all using specialized computer software. Harrison’s findings were confirmed by Professor Peter French, a colleague and lecturer in forensic speech and audio analysis at the University of York. They found no more than 8 shots were present on the recording." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.53.89 (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Page Full of Errors
Conspiracy theories are one thing, but having honest intellectual debate about this subject is another. This page tends to give too much credence to conspiracy and not enough to actual facts. At one point, the athor says that, "there is no record of RFK supporting Israel during that period." In fact, there is evidence to RFK's support of Israel. When Sirhan Sirhan was processed, two newspaper clippings were found in his pocket. One of them was from the Pasadena Independent Star News, dated June 2. There is also much reason to believe that Sirhan Sirhan wanted RFK to die. The best evidence of this fact can be found on a page in Sirhan's notebook. He writes, "RFK must die- RFK must be killed. Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated... Robert F. Kennedy must assassinated before 5 June 68." The whole page is dedicated to this mantra. Author Dan E Moldea concludes his book The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy with a story related to him by author Michael McCowan, which goes as follows:
“ | Suddenly, in the midst of their conversation, Sirhan started to explain the moment when his eyes met Kennedy's just before he shot him. Shocked by what Sirhan had just admitted, McCowan asked,'Then why, Sirhan, didn't you shoot him between the eyes?' With no hesitation and no apparent remorse, Sirhan replied,'Because that son of a bitch turned his head at the last second.' | ” |
If this appaling admission isn't enough to convict Sirhan, then I don't know what will. To admit conspiracy is to absolve Sirhan of his crime of murdering an important individual that had the potential to alter the course of American history. This page ought to be dedicated to upholding the facts and conclusions that place blame on the guily party and give the proper respect to the slain Kennedy. Dissent is cool 23:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Dissent Is Cool
2) As to the "RFK must die" journal entry, there have been a number of handwriting experts who have claimed that the handwriting for this entry does NOT match Sirhan's handwriting for any other entries in that journal. Plus the question of why Sirhan, who only had a grade school education, would have used English phrases like "unshakeable obsession". These issues should be discussed further.
And, while RFK may have been a supporter of Israel, so was EVERY OTHER Democratic candidate, as was the Democratic incumbent, Lyndon Johnson, AND all the Republican candidates of that year. The only serious 1968 presidential candidate who could accurately have been described as "anti-Israel" was segregationist third-party candidate George Wallace(the candidate, for whatever it may be worth, that Thane Cesar later admitted to supporting).
Therefore, there was nothing in RFK's position on Israel that would have marked him for death in Sirhan's eyes any more than any other major party candidate of that year.
And the one thing that opponents of the idea of a conspiracy to shoot RFK STILL have never adequately addressed is the finding of Dr. Noguchi in his autopsy of RFK that the fatal shot was fired from behind, at an upward "nearly verticle" angle and at point-blank range. Sirhan was NEVER in position to have fired this shot. Sirhan was in position, however, to have inflicted the non-fatal wounds suffered by the other shooting victims that evening. Ken Burch 11:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Ken Burch
- I agree with the above poster.Who edits this garbage? Entries for this subject must rank as one of the most biased and undersourced I have ever read.You quote me in part but ignore my research about Shane O'Sullivan's ridiculous RKK/CIA allegations and Steve Barber's article about the acoustics evidence which is challenges everything about the new Discovery Times documentary - see below -
You omit so much it is difficult to know where to start - perhaps here - where you will find further books and information which challenge your conspiracy-minded editor:
http://hnn.us/articles/32193.html
http://hnn.us/articles/38496.html
Most of this page is unreferenced nonsense Mindstar (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Pruszynski/Page Full of Errors
The Pruszynski Recording should absolutely have ITS OWN PAGE as well as a section in this article. Also, I suggest that the individual(s) who are the main contrib to this page strongly heed the urgings of the person who created the Page Full Of Errors section...an article like this is best served by sticking to those facts which are most indisputable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.163.197.204 (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)