Talk:Robert Earl Jones
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Death rumours
More semi-reliable internet sources are still claiming that Jones died September 7th. Wencer 15:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Age dispute
AP is saying that he was 96, which would put his birth year at 1910 or 1909. BGyss 23:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I think someone needs to take a closer look at all these dates, confirm them and make sure they match up, or state in the article that his age is disputed. As it stands, it appears that whoever wrote this has a serious problem with simple math.
96 seems to be the age (and thus the year 1910, assuming the date February 3 correct) favored by the vast majority of news media, as suggested by this simple Google search – feel free to pick the one you find reliable. Of course, if this is erroneus, repeating it a million times doesn't make it right. But usually in the case of people with obscure birth dates, the one reported at death is likely right (Lee Falk and John Lee Hooker come to mind). Note, however, that if you include "1910" in your search, you're likely to find him only a year of birth, or "January 1" as his birthday – suggesting it to be an approximation of his age. Now, if 1904 is correct, it could prove out to be useful to find out if his 100th birthday made the news. --Anshelm '77 11:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
As long as the age at death is stated to be 96, we should remove the category "American centenarians," especially since he is also under a category for people who died in their 90's. This is clearly absurd. -Dave 00:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Considering a number of online sources have years of birth ranging from 1911 to 1904 (and not just allegedly unreliable sources like the IMDb either), there should be something added to this article discussing the discrepency, as well a citation for the date of birth that is listed here. 23skidoo 21:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. I think it is impossible for him to be born in 1904 when his obituary said he was 96 and public records say 1910. Marcus2 18:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
I work for Matthew Earl Jones, REJ's son, and I assure you, the 1904 date is correct - Matthew told me they have a family bible that reports his birthdate as 1904. REJ himself supplied the 1910 date because he wanted to appear younger, as actors often do, and because he wanted to appear younger for his boxing career. If you're going to change it back to 1910 at least include a section saying that his birthdate is controversial. 63.228.151.114 23:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the obituaries say he was 96 when he died, and the Social Security Death Index says he was born in 1910. People may lie about their relatives ages to make them appear over 100. If he was born in 1904, we could also say that singer Frankie Valli may have been born in 1929. Who knows what his birth records say? Could both REJ and Frankie have legally changed their birthyears? Who knows? But the most authoritative sources say 1910 for REJ. That's why it should stay. 74.36.25.237 14:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Exactly. His age at death was reported as 96, not 102. Someone has said that 96 popped up because the family or whoever didn't report an age at the time of his death. Do you think that can happen? No, because they can't do that. The age at a person's death must be reported by a family member. And REJ said in the past he was born in 1911, not 1910. How do we know that this user who claims the 1904 family bible birthdate isn't lying, unless REJ legally changed his age? If I can be proven wrong, it is possible that Frankie Valli was born in 1929, and his birth certificate may say that, because it has been suggested that his band mates Nick Massi and Tommy DeVito of the Four Seasons were born in the 1920s as well. 70.101.182.149 (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)