Talk:Robert Davis (New Orleans)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Can someone clarify?
"His trial has been set for January 11."
In the context of the article, it is not at all clear who the word "his" is referring to.
- I believe it's all the policemen, and I've edited the article accordingly. But I'm not positive, and I'm too tired right now to go check. --zenohockey 04:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, I've confirmed that Jan. 11 is the policemen's trial date, and that Davis' date is seven days later. --zenohockey 16:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Journalist/Producer?
To my knowledge, the Associated Press "journalist" (as it says in the article) was, to be more specific, a producer working with those who filmed the beating itself. This isn't exactly crucial to the article's integrity, just something I noticed and thought should be fixed. I know I didn't sign in. Mi defecto on that one.
[edit] Update?
This article needs to be updated. What happened at the trials of the officers? Have any of the lawsuits panned out? It's been more than a year. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.186.36.172 (talk) 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Neutrality
This article is on a touchy subject, and I'm concerned about making it NPOV. Note this change, highlighting the two sides' positions. I have attempted to fix the article to help it adhere to NPOV, but I'm not sure it's right yet. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for requesting a glance-over for this article. While it shows some significant improvement, I believe that it has some statements which don't adhere to WP:NPOV. The most obvious ones include "curiously" and "it should be noted". Small statements like that reflect a media bias, and should be removed.
- On another note, it might just be me, but is the title of the article somewhat misleading? At first look, I thought it was a biographical article, but upon reading it it's clear that it's an article about an event, not a person. The name also places undue emphasis on Davis.Jame§ugrono 05:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)