Talk:Robert Davis (New Orleans)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents

[edit] Can someone clarify?

"His trial has been set for January 11."

In the context of the article, it is not at all clear who the word "his" is referring to.

I believe it's all the policemen, and I've edited the article accordingly. But I'm not positive, and I'm too tired right now to go check. --zenohockey 04:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Okay, I've confirmed that Jan. 11 is the policemen's trial date, and that Davis' date is seven days later. --zenohockey 16:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Journalist/Producer?

To my knowledge, the Associated Press "journalist" (as it says in the article) was, to be more specific, a producer working with those who filmed the beating itself. This isn't exactly crucial to the article's integrity, just something I noticed and thought should be fixed. I know I didn't sign in. Mi defecto on that one.

[edit] Update?

This article needs to be updated. What happened at the trials of the officers? Have any of the lawsuits panned out? It's been more than a year. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.186.36.172 (talk) 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Neutrality

This article is on a touchy subject, and I'm concerned about making it NPOV. Note this change, highlighting the two sides' positions. I have attempted to fix the article to help it adhere to NPOV, but I'm not sure it's right yet. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for requesting a glance-over for this article. While it shows some significant improvement, I believe that it has some statements which don't adhere to WP:NPOV. The most obvious ones include "curiously" and "it should be noted". Small statements like that reflect a media bias, and should be removed.
On another note, it might just be me, but is the title of the article somewhat misleading? At first look, I thought it was a biographical article, but upon reading it it's clear that it's an article about an event, not a person. The name also places undue emphasis on Davis.Jame§ugrono 05:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)