User talk:RNL Architecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] RNL Design article deleted

This was deleted as spam, vanity, non notable company, failure to meet WP:CORP. Take your pick. Your comments about it being your page may very well sum it up since it is not your page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and as such it covers encyclopedic material. This is not a site to host web pages for companies. Vegaswikian 22:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• Not sure this is the right way to respond but the firm has designed several notable architecture projects during the last 50 years. There are other architects on your site. What is the difference with who is accepted? By the way, I couldn't get a login with RNL Design. We don't want to host our web site here, just offer information about our architectural projects.
  • You need to read WP:CORP. It explains the criteria that a company needs to meet. You also should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, the bottom line there is that the company and its employees should not be the ones creating the article. Vegaswikian 23:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, you win I guess, but there are several other articles written by third parties that I think proves RNL is notable. [1] RNL named one of Top 10 architecture firms to work for in US - [2] 83-year old founder still active in architecture - [3] RNL named top architecure firm - [4]

sorry, forgot to sign RNL Architecture 23:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)RNL Architecture