User talk:Rmosler2100
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Dianetics mediation
Rmosler, if there are issues of bias regarding this mediation, I'd like to know your POV on the subject of religion and if you are a mediator. To make it fair I'll let you know I am a Scientologist. I am not a mediator, just helping to keep the discussion within context, in case that position is any problem to the mediation. --JimmyT 12:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
In response to your post of 07:41, 12 February 2006 on the Dianetics mediation page: what you suggest sounds like POV forking, and as such is not likely to be accepted by the other editors. Tenebrous 11:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC) The page dealing with forking and POV forking is a guideline, not official follow-it-to-the-letter-(or else!)-policy. I wouldn't go so far as to say that such a thing is wrong, but it's probably simpler to create one NPOV page than two separate NPOV pages. Tenebrous 13:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I don't know if you are interested, but the Dianetics issues continue. Have you seen the poll of "pseudoscience" on Dianetics (Talk) and ChrisO is going after Terryeo now with a Request for Comment. They have a list there of people who endorse what ChrisO says, and a place for outside comments from folks like me and you. Spirit of Man 02:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 13:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spelling of aberrant
I've made a few corrections of "abberant" to aberrant. This is not to detract from your excellent work.--Runcorn 10:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:2,2-dimethylbutane.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2,2-dimethylbutane.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Isilanes 19:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- That is totally fine. Good replacement.rmosler 02:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fibromyalgia
I think your suggestion is a good one -- go ahead and add the section in! I think you'll find this article useful in your editting as well: http://www.springerlink.com/content/1271314042w8405g/
My only suggestion would be to use the sub-title "Diagnostic Uncertainty" and to refrain from overtly harsh criticsm concerning the diagnosis. In any event, I'll try reviewing some more of the literature myself and will try to help you with editting.
