User talk:Rm w a vu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Drag EP 2 Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Across the Great Divide tour 3 Fair use rationale for Image:Asquaredmgmt.JPG 4 Request for Peer Review help 5 Request for peer review help 6 My Chemical Romance

[edit] Drag EP

Hi Rm w a vu, I'd appreciate your thoughts on an issue regarding the name of the first Drag EP, whatever it's called. Looks like you created the article. Please see the talk page. Grimhim (talk) 12:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Across the Great Divide tour

Hi, I found this nom and noticed that it was never completed. Would you like to nominate it? If not, then the discussion should be moved to the talk page and the page should be deleted. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 19:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Asquaredmgmt.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Asquaredmgmt.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for peer review help

Hi. I currently have the article Insane Clown Posse up for peer review, and I was wondering if you would be interested in taking a look at it and offering some advice to get the article up to FA quality? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC))

I had a couple of fair use concert photos in the article, but FAC reviewers suggested that I go without them. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 04:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC))

[edit] My Chemical Romance

Wikipedia is based on the views of verifiable second party sources in line with policy on verfiability not on your, or anyone else personal opinion or interpretation and certainly not the opinion of band. Neither is it a soapbox for personal views. It is not 'a broadly considered misconception'. It is cited by multiple sources including Rolling Stone, MTV, NME and allmusicguide (see My_Chemical_Romance#Musical style and influences) and was decided by consensus, see the discussion on the talk page. Warnings will be given is you continue to disrupt this article by removing it against the consensus. --neon white talk 15:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)