User talk:Rizalninoynapoleon/Archive 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] List of political clans in Philippines

An {{afd}} tag has been placed on List of political clans in Philippines, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. All Wikipedians can join the debate at Articles for deletion, where articles asserted to be inappropriate to Wikipedia are discussed. You are encouraged to submit your opinion, and remember that Articles for Deletion debates are not a vote. You can also leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the deletion tag yourself, but don't feel inhibited from editing the article, particularly if doing so makes it clear that it is a useful contribution to an encyclopaedia.

[edit] Image:Pgma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pgma.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 15:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pgma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pgma.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 15:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] still a No

I have long explained my position, that one source isn't enough to overhaul everything. No. Just go over and read through your history, and the statutes that have put them in place. That book just cited, but didn't give them credence as functioning full-pledged legislatures. Maybe you can present new arguments. But really still a No. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 07:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

And I thought you are volunteering to place yourself on a one-month break? I thought the matter has already been put to rest? Ano ba talaga?!?!? --- Tito Pao 05:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Isko Moreno

Isko Moreno ran and won as Vice Mayor of Manila under the Asenso Maynila party with Danny Lacuna as his running-mate.. On the other hand, Alfredo Lim ran and won as Mayor of Manila under the Genuine Opposition coalition with former Congressman Joey Hizon as his running-mate.... I am not aware na lumipat na pala ng partido si Isko Moreno.Angeles624 21:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] keep the template clean

just discuss it in the article, that should be sufficient. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 01:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On TEAM Unity and Genuine Opposition

With regard to Team Unity not being a party, the same goes with Genuine Opposition as it is more of a political coalition than a party itself. As we all know, GO is composed of different parties (LP, PDP-Laban, PMP, AD and others), but they have several senators elected carrying the name of that coalition. So, if Lacson and Trillanes (technically independents) were elected as senators under GO, doesn't it even make sense that Zubiri stole the 12th senatorial slot under the name of Team Unity?

And AFAIK with Team Unity back then, no independents were allowed to run under its banner as directed by their think-tank (i.e. "indies" Joker Arroyo was "forced" by the directorate to take oath with the midget thief's mother party Kampi and Sultan Kiram was also "forced" to have PDSP as his)...but still if GO has senators elected under its banner then so should Team Unity. Reyrefran 17:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Actually, a "GO" political party existed. COMELEC records show that. Most likely it was either PMP or UNO. Go check out the link I've provided on your user talk page. --Howard the Duck 14:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Treasury25note.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Treasury25note.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —— Eagle101Need help? 10:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)