User talk:Rizalninoynapoleon/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Philippine general election, 2007

You can give me the national summary that you have, my e-mail address is josephs_dagreat@yahoo.com. Thank you.--Joseph Solis in Australia 08:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Federico Sandoval II

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Federico Sandoval II, by Bolivian Unicyclist, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Federico Sandoval II fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

csd-11: Blatant advertising... which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Federico Sandoval II, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Federico Sandoval II itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


anything can be cleaned of spam, if there are any facts there at all, and all members of national legislatures are notable, so I did it in a few minutes. But it must have references to published sources such as newspapers. Please add them. DGG 21:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


(resetting indent) This isn't the first and probably not the only incident where you plagiarized an article from an online source, but as I was unable to look up another online source, much of my thoughts about this will remain speculative. Anyone who reads this article, though, will surely feel that much of this was copied from a campaign website; how else can you explain the hagiographic tone of this article? Show us your sources and prove to us that you did not merely cut and paste the information from one website to the Wikipedia. Much as I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, I need not remind you that this isn't the only time that you committed a copyright violation (in fact, you removed some of the user warnings I placed on your talk page, didn't you?) --- Tito Pao 07:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You call that sources? What did you do, visit Rep. Sandoval's office and requested for his CV and also contacted his fellow Jaycees? That's considered original research and is not allowed on WP. Can't you provide better sources than that? --- Tito Pao 23:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Philippine quasi-legislatures has been proposed for deletion

...again. Please comment at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 3#Template:Philippine quasi-legislatures to shed more light on the matter. –Pomte 06:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Felix Cantal

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Felix Cantal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheRingess (talk) 06:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of List of political clans in Philippines

An editor has nominated List of political clans in Philippines, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political clans in Philippines and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Resurgent insurgent 15:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)