Talk:Ritchie Humphreys

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ritchie Humphreys article.

Article policies
Good article Ritchie Humphreys has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
November 6, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
WikiProject on Football The article on Ritchie Humphreys is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the England task force.
WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday
WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday
This article is supported by the WikiProject on Sheffield Wednesday, which is an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of articles relating to Sheffield Wednesday F.C. Please participate by editing the article Ritchie Humphreys, or visit the project page for more details.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] GA Review

Hello, I will be reviewing this article to see if it is a Good Article. So far it passes the quick fail criteria, so a full review is forthcoming. Any questions, you may contact me on my talkpage. Regards, FamicomJL 21:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA pass

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Great job! This article easily passes. Any questions, feel free to contact me. FamicomJL 03:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)