From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
List |
This article has been rated as List-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. |
List |
This article has been rated as List-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
If all three disputes were merged here, it would still be a brief article. Country Club Area, for example, is not a very encyclopediable title. --Wetman 09:47, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Land disputes along this river are a recurring historical theme, yet very few articles on or off Wikipedia allude to that fact. Listening to most historians, you would think that the Chamizal was the end all be all of Rio Grande disputes. I had to do a lot of research to find all three disputes. This article, the Ojinaga Cut article, and the Country Club Area article are all slated for expansion. I didn't know how to label a US History Stub, as you can label stubs in other topics. I agree that Country Club Area is not the best title, but that is what the US Supreme Court called it. I've never heard the term Country Club Dispute used, though that would be a good title. Dr U 13:58, 27 September 2005 (UTC)