User talk:Ril editor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Ril logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ril logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ril editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 06:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anand Jain

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anand Jain, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. utcursch | talk 11:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Assuming that this message was left by you, I've re-worded the sentence that you seem to have problem with. Please have a look at the article, and feel free to discuss the matter. Thank you! utcursch | talk 13:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anand Jain. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. utcursch | talk 13:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Please don't removing sourced information from the article. Your claim that the information is false, is challenged by the sources mentioned in the article:

Can you please specify what information in the article is inaccurate.

None of the information in the article is libelous, defamatory or slanderous -- the article just states the fact that Anil Ambani had differences with Anand Jain. This information is easily verifiable with above-mentioned sources. I'll add a few more newspaper citations to the article, if these are not enough for you.

If you still dispute the addition of this information, I don't have any problem with a formal dispute resolution process.

If you've not read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, I urge you to go through it. Thank you. utcursch | talk 08:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anand Jain. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. utcursch | talk 07:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Anand Jain appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. utcursch | talk 08:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Anand Jain, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 04:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

This is your final warning. Wikipedia is not your marketing department. You've repeatedly removed all references and important information from the article. Please stop manipulating the article Anand Jain to suit your needs. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Manual of style. Thank you. utcursch | talk 04:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Editing from IP address is of no use. If you've any genuine concerns with the article, please discuss them on the talk page. There is no libel or misinformation in the article. You seem to be trying to whitewash the subject's association with the Ambanis, but that's an important part of the subject's business career and life. Even if you remove the information from Wikipedia, it's available all over the Internet on several news sites: just Google for "Anand Jain". So, please stop your attempts to remove this information from the article -- they're futile. utcursch | talk 05:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for biased editing on the article Anand Jain, inspite of multiple warnings regarding conflict of interest and neutral point of view. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. talk 11:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

utcursch | talk 11:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ril logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ril logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reliance Fresh

May I ask why are you removing the Podcast link on the Reliance Fresh controversy repeatedly? Wikipedia works on a non-partisan approach and all views must get equal preference, that includes unpleasant views. In any case the podcast is quite fair in its approach. What's your problem? --Debashishc (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)