User talk:Ridgedoga
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] The God Who Wasn't There
Hi. Whether the film is propaganda is a matter of opinion, and not fact. If a reliable source opines that it lapses into propaganda at times, then it is acceptable to mention this, but only if that opinion is attributed as such. Describing it as propaganda in a matter-of-fact manner in the Intro gives the appearance that Wikipedia is describing it a such, which is unacceptable. Please do not revert that information. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- "You are wrong" In what way am I wrong? Let's discuss it on that article's Talk Page, okay? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at The God Who Wasn't There. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 06:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view, No Original Research or 3RR policies by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, or citing yourself as a "source", rather than discussing the dispute on the article's Talk Page, as you did to The God Who Wasn't There, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nightscream (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome!
|