User talk:Rich257/Archive/Archive-2006Dec

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Austen Kark copyvio 2 Agile software development 3 Your post 4 Solid state drive article 5 Leeds Construction Link

[edit] Austen Kark copyvio

Hi, Rich. I removed the copyvio. Will try to rewrite today. Feel free to delete copyvio's whenever you find them. Just leave a note on the talk page and note it in the edit summary. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Agile software development

Thanks for fixing the cite. I'm still using the "old citation format" we had in 2001 . . . ^_^ --Uncle Ed 15:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your post

I left comments on the articles talk page. --evrik 22:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Solid state drive article

I have added several cleanup tags and a merge proposal to the Solid state drive article, that have been removed a number of times by probably the same user. I have asked that the changes be discussed on the article´s talk page to no avail. There is a limit to the number of times I can reapply the tags, and I don´t want to get in to a add-delete battle. I consider the tags to be reasonable for the reasons mentioned on the talk page. What should I do next so the article is brought in to line with Wikipedia standards? Rich257 23:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

The best way to ensure the article is brought in to line with Wikipedia standards is to wikify the article yourself. It doesn't take too long and it's easier than edit warring over tag addition. As for the merge proposal, you could start the discussion as to why it should be merged and invite the other user to chime in. If he doesn't, I'm sure there are other users who can contribute. Hope that helps, and if nothing does, there's always Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. --Keitei (talk) 03:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leeds Construction Link

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Leeds Construction Link, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Leeds Construction Link. You may remove the {{dated prod}} template, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)