Talk:Richard Sampson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Anglicanism
Richard Sampson is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Christianity This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] edit the page

"Being a man of no principle, and solely bent on a distinguished ecclesiastical career..."

Not that I am qualified to edit this section, but I am pretty sure that whoever wrote this has never met Richard Sampson. Also, there are no surviving documents that would provide such insights into his personality and personal motivations.

I just don't think that one person's ill-informed exageration or embellishment, or whatever that is, should be one of the few things people think they know about him.

Can someone please make that paragraph sound like an encyclopedia entry, rather than the intoductory sentence for a gothic romance novel?

thanks.

Anataria (talk) 14:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)