Talk:Richard Milton (scientific researcher)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ok this is all bullshit, i mean, you can tell right off the back, it says "criticisms" and then goes on to support the guy? that ISNT criticism...it looks VERY biased, someone needs to change that

Agreed, and I think I'll be bold and do it. I'm no fan of Dawkins, but this article violates NPOV in the extreme. ~ CZeke 13:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. I have to wonder if Milton himself had a hand in the previous version of this page... the phrasing is suspiciously similar to that found on his website (in fact, there was one line I just turned into a quote). ~ CZeke 02:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Classed as scientist versus writer

I've read some columns of his and I don't know of any experiments he's done - surely he's a writer rather than a scientific researcher? Autarch (talk) 21:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Milton is a writer and his website http://www.alternativescience.com stated that. However, that website seems to have been taken down. Does anyone know why? Rodneysmall (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)