Talk:Richard Marius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doesn't the section about his death belong at the end rather than in the middle? I'll wait and see if anyone wants to discuss this; I'm forever violative of WP:BB because I see this as a collaborative effort requiring good relationships, it's not about me. Rlquall 21:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm open to discussion on this. When I was writing that section, it just seemed to make more sense to have a birth-to-death biographical sketch as a complete unit, separate from lengthy units about his scholarly work, his novels, and the most famous public incident involving him. In addition, the death bit is only a few sentences, so it seemed more like a subset of the bio than a stand-alone unit. But I'm not wedded to this structure if there is a good reason to change it. Archaic 15:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image?
Nice article; I think an image of Marius would a useful addition. ThaddeusFrye 23:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)