Talk:Richard Connolly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the Christian music WikiProject, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Christian music. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by the Contemporary Christian Task Force.
This article falls within the scope of the WikiProject contemporary music, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of contemporary music subjects. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Flag
Portal
Richard Connolly is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on June 21, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is just a begionning for this page. I will have more references and citations within the week . Cheers Cor Unum 04:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] References

If the site is said to have no references; what are cf. Australasian Catholic Record October 1995 and cf. Fr Edmund Campion's online article in Catalyst for Renewal . Aren't these references?Cor Unum 12:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I think the issue is usually, References are "All the individual titles used in compiling this article" and Notes are "All the specific pages / URLs within the works named as References used in creating this article".
My solution is a single "Notes and references" section. I think the Manual of Style has a different idea on this, WP:CITE may provide another suggestion.Garrie 03:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)