Talk:Reynolds v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

This article is part of Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject, an attempt to provide comprehensive and detailed information about the Latter Day Saint movement and Mormonism on Wikipedia. To participate in the project, edit this article, visit the List of articles about the Latter Day Saint movement, the project page, and/or join the discussion. For writing guidelines about contributing to the project, you may want to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Latter Day Saints) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints)

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Are dates correct for decided and argued?

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/casefinder/casefinder_1863-1889.html gives a date of 1879 for Reynolds v. United States. Some references give 1878. The case was reargued. Does anyone have a solid reference for the dates in the case? Nereocystis 14:44, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bigamy versus polygamy

Was the case for Bigamy of polygamy? The legal terms have changed in the past 100 years, but there is a difference. Anyone know? -Visorstuff 16:34, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

The FindLaw link quotes from the original law,

Every person having a husband or wife living, who marries another, whether married or single, in a Territory, or other place over which the United States have exclusive jurisdiction, is guilty of bigamy, and shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500, and by imprisonment for a term of not more than five years.

I believe that this is the Poland Act, passed in 1874, which is mentioned in the decision. The Morrill Act is not explicitly mentioned in the decision, though the Poland Act modified the Morrill Act. I don't know whether this really answers the question. Nereocystis 17:25, 12 August 2005 (UTC)