User talk:Rex07

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] SSR Page

Thanks for adding the page on SSRs. It was much needed and is nicely done. --Stangbat 19:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CampusJ is not spam

It's a site that is Notable. I'm adding links to it only from relevant articles.--Urthogie 04:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] speedy delete

darn it you beat me to it. It would have been my first speedy delete I caught. Oh well. See you around. in ref to Daniel Louis Zaruszak page.--Xiahou 03:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Reaching: a thought?

Hope you've been enjoying editing here; I find it addictive myself. - Some advice, though I know what Oscar Wilde did say on that subject...
Since Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it would be my own suggestion to incorporate Reaching in the article Glossary of nautical terms or something similar rather than giving it its own article by itself. (But don't make it an {{uncat}} - that is, the more you get in the habit of putting every article you create in a Category, like Category:Sailing or more specifically - for example: Category:Nautical terms, the more helpful to readers and other editors your article is. Thanks and happy editing - Schissel | Sound the Note! 03:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Apparently redirecting to an anchor is possible (Piano Trio No. 1 (Beethoven) - let me see how that's done. As for fixing a redirect that's gone bad, click edit this page, then in the top bar, replace Points of sail with Reaching (at least, that's one way) so that the link reads

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reaching&action=edit

(getting rid of #Running. Which isn't a main subheading, though the link is

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing#Running, though it's a subheading of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing#Basic_sailing_techniques . Never have gotten a subsubheading anchor to be properly dropped to in Wikipedia... may have to settle for a redirect to Basic sailing techniques, or restructure the article a bit?)

(Edit. Oh. Yes. Sailing#Running, not Points of sail#Running. Try that?) -- before the edit-- and then

(hrm. The Beethoven redirect "source" reads:

#REDIRECT [[Piano Trios Nos. 1 - 3, Opus 1 (Beethoven)#Opus 1 No. 1 - Piano Trio No. 1 in E flat major]] so it's not the style of your link that was bad- that was fine. I think it's the subsubheading problem that's also stymied me. Hrm again...) Schissel | Sound the Note! 04:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Wait. Points of sail doesn't have a subheading Running. It has #Reaching and #Running Downwind. Try Points of sail#Reaching ? (I was reading the article Sailing *baps head against internal headbapping.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 04:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello, Rex07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

[edit] Scapegoat Publications

They are a legitimate book publisher, small and new, but legitimate all the same. Same as Last Gasp, et al. How is that spam???? rebecca 21:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Helicon Photo OS

This is not spam. It's a legitimate stub for software. Althepal 04:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)