Talk:Revolution OS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
This article is part of the Linux WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Linux, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

Is it legal to link the movie itself? Is the movie itself freely distributable?

  • But is the dvd a liveboot distribution which can play itself? (a recursive dvd!) -- Sy / (talk)
No, the author of the film asked not to distribute copies of it. --Anthony Ivanoff 28 June 2005 03:56 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if we have a link to the movie, as long as the movie is not on Wikipedia... if for some reasons there is a copyright infringement on the movie, then it will be taken off that site and nothing will happen to us. Cbrown1023 17:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Copyrights says "However, if you know that an external Web site is carrying a work in violation of the creator's copyright, do not link to that copy of the work. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States". Removing. 79.74.255.75 12:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] a shame

i think it's a shame that a movie about free software is itself copyrighted even after 4 years!!

is the interviews freely avaliable?

Free software is also copyrighted, which is vital to its success. Superm401 - Talk 06:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
It's not open or "Free" content either. Which is rather obviously the original poster's point if you care to be a little less pedantic. —Pengo talk · contribs 07:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Red links

Resolved.

The main red links at this point are links to various film festivals. Many of these festivals are red-linked from elsewhere too (e.g., Film festivals in North and Central America). It seems to mainly represent a lack of coverage on Wikipedia's part of various (smaller) film festivals. I don't think any of these red links need to be removed from this article, and therefore propose removing the "redlinks" tag. --Erik Demaine 20:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

redlinks tag? —Pengo 23:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree. done. Sverdrup❞ 11:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh. That redlinks tag —Pengo 00:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)