Talk:Reverse graffiti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Hoax?
According to User talk:Tjproechel, the creator of this article intends it to be a hoax and that "it still hasn't been spotted yet". However, I'm not sure about the accuracy of these comments, even though they were left by the author him/herself. Has anybody else been wondering about this? --Qmwne235 23:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Although I'm not very familiar with the term, reverse graffiti isn't a hoax - just try a Google search. Ali (t)(c) 03:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- This page is a hoax. The author admits it on Tjproechel's user talk. Tjproechel was the guy that made the Upper Peninsula War hoax.
Wish I had as much time on my hands as you, creating that page Upper_Peninsula_War looks so convincing. My page Reverse graffiti Still hasn't been spotted though.
People actually do "reverse graffiti," but I doubt the term is real, and the article probably has many falsities in it. SteveSims (talk) 04:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I have heard the term used (several times in fact around my town), but maybe it is because of the article. NathanD 016 (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Length of Sections
The article is very short with each "section" only a sentence so I have combined them in to one. 68.50.168.239 03:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] information
maybe it'd be worth talking about this article: http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2007/10/dirty-trick-cau.html . this page needs more information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.221.143.13 (talk) 20:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)