Talk:Revanta/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] GA Review

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 1, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass (balanced)

2. Factually accurate?: Pass (increase references scope)

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass (for a small topic)

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass (alternative points of view and quotes will improve article)

5. Article stability? Pass (no edit wars recorded)

6. Images?: Pass (for a small topic passable but additional images are welcomed)

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.

It appears this article to the subject it covers provides sufficient information. Using furhter sources to provide a wider perspective is welcomed, but does not necessitates failing under any of the above criteria. Additional illustrations are welcomed. Wikidās-ॐ 11:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)