Talk:Revanta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Revanta has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on March 22, 2008.
June 1, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject_Hindu_Mythology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hindu mythology, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hindu mythology. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Wikiproject_Hinduism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance for this Project's importance scale.

[edit] GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Revanta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 1, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass (balanced)
2. Factually accurate?: Pass (increase references scope)
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass (for a small topic)
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass (alternative points of view and quotes will improve article)
5. Article stability? Pass (no edit wars recorded)
6. Images?: Pass (for a small topic passable but additional images are welcomed)

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.

It appears this article to the subject it covers provides sufficient information. Using furhter sources to provide a wider perspective is welcomed, but does not necessitates failing under any of the above criteria. Additional illustrations are welcomed. Wikidās-ॐ 11:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)