Talk:Return to Never Land

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Return to Never Land article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Contents

[edit] Um, the octopus and the crocodile never met

In Return to Never Land the crocodile was replaced by an orange octopus for no apparent reason. It is now believed that since the crocodile was killed (we see it on Hook), the octopus, who was the crocodile's best friend, is determined to kill Hook for revenge.

I'm sorry, but whoever wrote this is terribly mistaken for several reasons. First of all, the crocodile and the octopus never met. There was never any indication of them once knowing one another. Also, Return To Never Land is a sequel to the 1950s Disney version of Peter Pan...not a sequel to Hook. Even though Captian Hook does say he got rid of the crocodile, he never said that he killed it. For all we know, he could've just somehow driven the crocodile away or captured him. The reason why the octopus went after Captain Hook was explained in the film. Hook was going to sacrifice Jane (whom Hook thought was Wendy) to the octopus (called "the beast" in the film) for food. But, due to Peter Pan and Tinkerbell's pixie dust, the octopus ended up landing on Hook and Hook ended up inside the octopus's mouth. Much like the crocodile, the octopus liked the taste of Hook and decided to persue him in order to devour the evil pirate.--24.111.137.236 23:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Anonymous.


I have to agree.

I don't see anything for box office.

[edit] Vandalism

69.0.41.239 made a bunch of changes to this entry, some of which (changing Danny to a girl) are vandalism, while some (adding Andrew McDonough are valid). Does someone want to read the thing carefully to take out the bad edits, as well as tighten it up a bit?Cheeselouise 05:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Soundtrack

The page's listing of the soundtrack was rather screwed up, including listing Jeff Bennett as the singer of "I'll Try (Reprise)" instead of Jonatha Brooke. Brooke was listed as the singer of "So To Be One of Us" and "Hook and the Lost Boys" instead of the tracks she did contribute ("I'll Try," "I'll Try (Reprise)," and "Second Star to the Right." I went ahead and fixed it. KyrieEleison (talk) 04:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg

Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)